“Cyberpunk 2077 VS Starfield”
Asmongold Clips / Asmongold Reacts To: Cyberpunk 2077 VS Starfield by CohhCarnage
Check out Cohh on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/cohhcarnage
and YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CohhCarnage
On this Asmongold Clips Youtube Channel you’ll never quit finding all the funny Asmongold Moments with Mcconnell and the best Asmongold Highlights from the most popular games, like: Baldur’s Gate 3, Starfield, Blizzard’s Diablo 4, Dragonflight & Hardcore Classic WoW, the record breaking MMORPG FFXIV, Path of Exile 2, sneak peeks from Gameplay of the upcoming Riot MMO and playthroughs of many other popular games like Hogwarts Legacy, Final Fantasy 16, Elden Ring and more. Also Asmongold Reacts to a lot of content, such as World Record Speed Run of games, Blizzard Drama, “Asmongold AI”, VTubers, and videos of some of the most interesting creators like penguinz0, Internet Historian, Emiru, Dunkey, Linus Tech Tips and more. Asmon is also known for his “The True Story of Asmongold”, “Asmongold $2 Pizza” and “Asmongold $2 Steak” videos, the legendary Transmog Competitions and Mount Off competitions, Ban Appeals, Media Share streams, Reddit Recap Reactions and much more.
► Asmongold TV: https://www.youtube.com/@AsmonTV
► Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/zackrawrr
Editor: Daily Dose of Asmongold
Contacts:
Tweets by DAsmongold
dailydoseofasmongoldyt@gmail.com
Views:711745
Taqs:asmongold,asmongold clips
コメント
コメント (774)
トラックバックは利用できません。
A golden garbage can is still a garbage can
Starfield is an controversial 7 out of 10
Cyberpunk 2077 Neon at night is nice
It is hilarious remembering how cyberpunk had one of the worst launches in gaming but is being held up as a great game now
Cyberpunk won because they fixed it….same with No man’s sky. Can’t expect that from Bethesda. That’s up to the modders
The day and night cycles are gone from the game like something sucked it out , I miss the vendors going to bed in there stores and then there spouses say Guards
It’s not even that there are less loading screens… There are NO loading screens aside from fast traveling, but that’s impossible to avoid.
I saw some guy trying to claim that Starfield at launch was better than Cyberpunk 2077 at launch.
I played Cyberpunk 2077 at launch for 60 hours in one week.
I played Starfield at launch for two hours and ten minutes and then refunded it for Steam credit.
have a look at Strays world dude
Overcrowded trash vs. empty trash
Starfield would probably be considered a neat little game…if it weren’t marketed as a AAA experience in 2024 and sold for full price.
trash game VS trash game
this would be the best title for the video
It’s crazy how out of touch with video games someone who makes a living off them could be.
starfield is great because i was able to return it after literally 5 minutes of play time.
Not even a debate anymore starfield is dogshit compared to what cyberpunk is rn
Cyberpunk 2077 presentation and production values are garbage compared to Red Dead Redemption 2
Ok so, I just 100% completed cyberpunk on series s. Probably the most beautiful game out right now. Just started starfield with a few hours in, obviously two different games but starfield is beautiful in its own way. Bethesda has a strange charm to their games that no one else can replicate
I got Starfield for free with my purchase of AMD CPU and haven’t even installed it. It looks like garbage in every vid I see. Cyberpunk, which I just started a few weeks ago and finished today, is one of the best games I’ve ever played.
No Mans Sky has ship building now? I think?
Latest update said something along those lines.
Oh great, for the first 4 hours after which i dropped starfield i was not even informed that you can build your ship.
Whenever someone says “i like starfield” it is actually a hidden dog whistle to the other masochists.
Is Cyberpunk 2077 going to give GTA6 a run forThe money.
Who would have though that a game will be compared to Cyberpunk…
Fuck starfield, utter dogshit game
Stardield doesn’t deserve a six. It deserves 4 or less.
at this point i’m just watching for the editor..
Even at launch 2077 was still better than Starfield could ever be.
I finished starfield after 150 hours and was hooked for the whole time. I’m playing CP77 now and I gotta say I don’t understand the comparisons. Cyberpunk story is so bad, just annoying with the braindances and Johnny talking shit to you all the time, it’s FULL of bugs STILL (didn’t encounter a single bug in Starfield), gameplay feels pointless, combat isn’t smooth at all, and even the graphics feel worse than Starfield. Are people actually brainwashed to protest against Starfield or the fuck is going on?
Yeah startfield is a 6.5
Starfield doesn’t even have functioning land vehicles
Why this garbage was recommended to me? Nothing i was searching for with misleading title…
Neon in Starfield was pretty much a street with load screens
Asmon looks like a literal caveman
Cyberpunk suffered from being ambitions and rushed, Starfield suffers from being dragged out and not ambitious enough.
Well yeah they aren’t even the same game, because in starfield you don’t play the game, you watch loading screens.
Theres like 2 loading screens in Cyberpunk 😂 you can enter every building properly and elevators arnt even desguised loading screens they avtually go point A ti B unlike fallout 4 😂
“I like Starfield” is always followed by a but
Cyberpunk is better than starfield but to be completely honest both of these titles are trash. CP 2077 even though it looks great the city do not feel alive. It’s one of the most miserable maps I’ve ever played. The writing is trash, the driving is trash, the ai is trash, crafting is trash, the rpg mechanics are trash, the choices absolutely don’t matters and is just an illusion, all endings are similar just a different coat of paint, lots of npcs but adds nothing to the game, main character is just a placeholder for Johnny, vendor and loot system is atrocious. Bought this title because of all the praise it’s been receiving and the reviews, the biggest mistake I’ve made and one I won’t be repeating.
The environment in Cyberpunk 2077 is insane. Night City is pretty damn big but there are buildings, signs, you name it, everywhere. It never feels like CDPR made Cyberpunk massive just for the sake of being massive. No place is empty, except for the Badlands but that’s a design choice ’cause it’s supposed to be a desert
I played Starfield first. On Game Pass. Then I recently started Cyberpunk after the patch. It’s fucking night and day. I don’t give a fuck if they’re two different styles – I agree; Starfield is gruel and Cyberpunk is a fucking neon-lit plate of sushi with speed-laced wasabi. It’s off the fucking rails and I love it for that. Starfield feels like I’m playing a game made by someone who doesn’t enjoy games.
1:30 dude just buy star wars lego’s then, bet you spent 100 hours on the fallout 4 just building.
That’s not Jesus that’s a serial killer.
Hahahaha Shifield, fuck you Todd “it just works” Howard
Todd Howard KNEW what his competition was, even Baulder’s Gate dropped a full month before Starfield. Even though Todd KNEW how the game looked, played, ect. he continued on claiming Starfield was going to be a masterpiece. Personally, I hope Microsoft fires Todd’s ass before he destroys Elder Scrolls 6. (And remember Elder Scrolls was NOT Todd’s creation, it was an IP that Bethesda PURCHASED.)
I love that CohhCarnage is literally in Cyberpunk lmao
I sniped an enemy and I can see him going up the stairs to find me in the house.
Ship building in starfield looks pretty well done.. from the outside. If you wanna design a ship based on the looks inside well then suddenly the builder is HELL.
Listen. I love Bethesda games. I play Fallout 76 and Starfield daily. But Cyberpunk 2077 is hands down graphically the most beautiful game Ive ever played. Everything is so intricate and vibrant. Starfield cannot compare.
I liked starfield but damn even its ship building was meh… i disagree it wasnt cool, there was literally no rules to it you could game it so much that a stupid looking ship would make a great functioning ship… lego building had more thought and planning.
People are like “you should compare Starfield 3 years later to Cyberpunk 3 years later” but just compare Starfield now to Phantom Liberty now. PL by itself is still a top notch beautiful expansion that blows Starfield away.
Outpost building in Starfield is far from cool.
Starfield had a better launch then Cyberpunk, well hype yes, but actually playing….no
I fuckin love Cyberpunk and i havent even played it yet
cyberpunk had a sloppy release, i really wish they’d taken the time to finish polishing it and removing bugs,
because the game is so god damn good and the bad release dampened the experience for a lot of people.
Thats fair from someone who hasnt played any other bethesda game. I would give it 4/10. Reason being it is worse than fallout 3 and skyrim and also the padding for everything you do in Starfield is just painful and absolutely done on purpose.
Edit: To be fair, starfield would tear cyberpunk a new one if they were both compared on release. Cant believe that bethesda game would be less buggy than something else, but here we are.
Starfield is not a good game. End of story.
Can’t wait till 2026 when Starfield is the same piece of shit and the apologists no longer have the argument of “It took them 3 years to fix Cyberpunk”
A long time ago i kept telling myself that cyberpunk is a good game while everyone on the internet was saying the opposite. In my eyes cyberpunk was too boring, and then they added something like buying appartments wich you can enter and sit in a sofa or sleep in a bed … Nothing else.
These games are 2 totally different kind of games so comparing them is useless.
At least starfield is giving me lots of fun gaming time these months… Was looking forward for assassins creed mirage release the past couple of months but that game is a joke at
Bro , someone tell me that guy in the video doesnt look and sound that one crazy preacher dude outside of Misty’s shop
Shipbuilding is better in Starfield then Cyberpunk 2077. You can have that one.
Bought starfield and then playing cyber punk made me get a refund from steam , don’t think I’ll turn back until the modders do their work
someone in chat : “editor about to make a clip”.
So true 😂
man, you guys went thru a lot of copium this year
cyberpunk : give it a couple year the dev will fix it
startfield : give it a couple months the modders will fix it
Starfield is shit.
I was REALLY excited for Neon. Picked the neon background. Made my way there early in my play through. NEON FUCKING SUCKS!!!! Complete trash. Looks like shit, isn’t fun to explore, the penthouse has the worst fing view of any player home in ALL of Bethesda’s games. The AI is so fing stupid you can walk around the check point in plain view of the guards. Who the fuck designed this shit hole.
It’s so moronic to watch that were shitting on Cyberpunk just 2 years ago, praise it just because everyone does..
Cyberpunk was always good. It was just full of bugs.
Starfield on the other hand will be good only with mods. These 2 are different games.
I wish people would stop comparing these two games all the time. Or at the very least, comparing current footage of the games. Cyberpunk had been out and getting improved for like 3 years. If we want to be fair, the videos should be posting what Cyberpunk looked like on release and comparing that to Starfield, because Cyberpunk was certainly not the shining gem it is now on launch. 👀
Starfields will get a 2.0 as well so wait.
Cyberpunk 2077 was made by dedicated devs who put blood, sweat, and tears into their IP’s, however, Bethesda on the other hand is a glorified dogshit with bare
adventursim and no decent gameplay. Cyberpunk offers all kinds of gameplay A-thousand fold more than Starfield will EVER dish out.
I’m right. You know it, even your mom knows it.
Cyberpunks night city looks better yeah but 90 percent of the city is just all looks. You can’t go inside most of the stores or buildings.
2077 looked like that day 1. The game just isn’t fun and feels like shit to play.
“Ship building is good” meanwhile Me, playing Space Engineers, “Man, you don’t know what good ship building is”
lol i love this dude is a character in cyberpunk
Comparing CP77 to Starfield is like Comparing Need For Speed to Grand Turismo, both have similar things but are two totally different types of games. CP77 focuses on a smaller world setting being a whole damn city, where as Starfield is all about space exploration and multiple planets and systems.
I bought Starfield, and Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 on the same day. I played SF for about 10 hours because I was more excited about it, and thought, yeah, it’s okay, definitely not worth the hype. I then switched over to CP and after 50 hours of play, can’t believe how good the game is. It’s a literal masterpiece in gaming, and acting, art, story, everything is “chefs kiss”. Oh and I never picked SF back up…
Ha ha ha aaahhh, HAH hah HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HA HHAAAAaaaah!!!!
Very diferent game. RPG game vs Open world action game so no. Compared content vs content. Side missions, Faction mission in starfield you choose to joining factions, CP 2077 NOP, weapons customization, building ship, outpost, etc. Both games are great but diferent.
i legit thought that was a pause menu or something but not the game.
I just become a pirate again,.and not a space pirate. But the piratebay type
ship building is best thing in starfield, game is ok, rather big , and you can just wonder around , but cyberpunk is way better
Nature is difficult to represent, to replicate… so this is why Cyberpunk is not a next gen game **THERE IS NO NATURE AT ALL**
Humans are difficult to represent, to replicate in 3D, so this is why Cyberpunk is not a nextgen game **THERE IS ONLY CLOWNS, EVERYWHERE**
Cyberpunk is just textures that force you to buy a new graphic card … a scam dedicated to the sheeps !
Starfield> a shame like Skyrim & Fallout 4 … a world of clowns far away to be nextgen … a game dedicated to the addict gamers, the parasites > the supersheeps!
Stupid people will compare Starfield to very old games like,
No man’s Sky **2016**
Star Citizen **2012**
Elite Dangerous **2014**
Shit, are they retarded ? … they are just paid by someone, retarded & dependent of everything in their life.
We are comparing a game with 3 years of patches, fixes, mods with a game that is completely new. It’s not really fair even if some criticisms are legitimate.
Anyway, both cyberpunk and starfield are symptomatic of the fact that large AAAs come out with multiple problems anyway. However i have to admit Bethesda with their experience in open world rpg should do something better. I have the impression that they have difficultiesupdating themselves in terms of technology.
Any random hallway in CP77 looks more cyberpunk than the whole Neon city
people who hate on cp2077 forget that it never supposed to be a ,,GTA-like” game. You can compare it more to Deus ex or Watchdogs with RPG elements. I don’t hate starfield, i consider it more of a sandbox game with rpg elements, but people who say that the world, NPC’s and story are better than in cyberpunk are delusional
Can’t compare them
they are nothing alike, where can you build a base or ship in cyberpunk?
Cyberpunk has characters that don’t come off as animatronic. I do like Starfield, it fills a niche I never knew existed (NASA-Punk). But Cyberpunk is just… I mean… You know? The 2.0 update and phantom liberty are just incredible. If Cyberpunk released in the state that 2.0 is in, the face of gaming would be a lot different today.
And I’m glad there will be a Cyberpunk sequel.
The only thing Bethesda can do right now and not doom all its future games is use a newer engine.
One important difference I noticed, when you’re first exposed to that gorgeous view in Cyberpunk, the only things you hear is city buzz and jackie saying: “Man of the hour!”, vs the first time you leave the mines in starfield, you look at a barren brown rocky shithole planet and the game plays this swelling orchestra music.
Going from starfield to the new cyberpunk 2.0 and PL dlc was such a breath of fresh air for me. In starfield I felt like I was constantly clogged down by loading screens. You had to go through loading screens to go into a shop, into buildings, etc. etc. With cyberpunk everything is so seamless and there is very little loading screens outside of fast travelling. So much more immersive than starfield.
Neon has a better noir flair due to the shaders, but it doesn’t look better then Cyberpunk 2077. Cyberpunk did go the more lively road with their aesthetic. It’s also more realistic imo, because even if the cyberpunk genre is influenced by film noir and brutalist achitecture, it doesn’t exist only in night time and even tho corporations don’t give a damn about the people, they still do cater to them and with that in mind a corp. City doesn’t need to look unwelcoming.
I like Starfield. Buuut…
Slowly removes pants.
Starfield is fantastic! But how does cyberpunk look 20 times better and runs higher fps than starfield on the same pc 😅
haha “cp” i mean cyberpunk not child por*
So we just gonna forget how busted and dumpster trash Cyberpunk was at launch.
Starfield is more polished on consoles than Cyberpunk was at launch. Cyberpunk had lot of basic features missing and they scammed lastgen users to pay 60$ for it.
It took them 3 years plus a DLC to make it great while NMS did for free in less time with smaller team.
Starfield higher Metacritic than Cyberpunk base game at launch. It has issues which will be fixed too in coming months plus mods gonna make stuff even better on consoles and pc. Bethesda will support mods on Xbox as well unlike CDPR who give official mod support to PC only.
Also why there’s so much daily Starfield hate videos on this channel ? Starfield has issues but still its a good game. Its a new ip and very hard to nail new ips.
I’ve waited for star field and my hype for the game is 300000x! Lol so I played a bit, then paused it for CP2077 Phantom Liberty! 😂😊 CDPR wins for me
Cyberpunk story and immersion cannot be compared to Starfield
Starfield is full of loading screens, Cyberpunk has 1 loading screen, once you load in ur good. That alone makes you feel so immersed, I never got that in starfield. Bethesda is just years behind in game design, it shows with how dated most mechanics in starfield are.
Cyberpunk ♥️ Starfield 💩
cyberpunk 2077 is better than fallout 4 & 76 currently at 1.6😂😂 even without 2.0 update, bethesda been dropping mediocre games since fallout 3
Man you know starfield is down bad when it’s being compared to cyberpunk
played cyberpunk on launch, had a decent experience with minimal bugs. Solid 7 game
after starfield + 2.0 cyberpunk:
starfield – 3/10
cyberpunk 9/10
All this peeps crying for starfield lets see whether ur starfield gets an 2.0 update ever. ES6 WILL be on the same engine 😂 lmao just yuck man tell ur toddy boi to create a better engine
So if starfield is just above average, then your average score for games would be a 5??
After 39 patches it’s now a good game lol
Coh Carnage is a paid actor by CD Projekt Red… literally… Is what the Starfield stans would say lol. Cyberpunk is so much better in every way. I do agree Starfield has great ship building which is fun and all, but it’s apples to oranges. Glad you’re enjoying your playthrough of Cyberpunk!
Yeah, but the fact that they didn’t try to go for 60 FPS on console
To bad Cohh will blindly defend the games hes in. Hes not wrong here, but his defending CP when it first came out was notable.
Cyberpunk has a better aesthetic
but starfield is better at launch
The world and writing of cyberpunk kept me playing through the above average gameplay loop (with aspects of the game being like PS2 level like driving and the police mechanics on release)
The gameplay of starfield is keeping me playing starfield a lot more than its world, the writing so far is pretty good.
SF gameplay is worse than CP overall. They couldn’t even bother to make the jet pack hover or boost horizontally.
Why am I watching this?
So Starfield is Minecraft with ships?!? 😅
BOTH TRASH
1:23 since when was starfield a space game? you cant explore freespace. you just fast travel between planets, 0 seamlessness. starfield is a fallout game in space.
Comparing Starfield to Cyberpunk is a night and day comparison but the only difference is Starfield recently came out where Cyberpunk when it came out it was in a bad state but then they just made it amazing. So let’s see if our friends at Bethesda can do the same.
Even I’ll say it now, I do love cyberpunk but man night city is one of the greatest city’s in video game history it feels like an actual
Real place, more than gta 5 to me anyway
Kudos for cdpr team to not ditch the game completely but keep working on it relentlessly.
gotta love when streamers watch a video. (plays two seconds, pauses, commentates an hour on the two words said, closes video)
When cyberpunk was released, everyone mocked it with GTA 5. See how the tables have turned 😂
The Phantom Liberty’s Dogtown is so crazy, anywhere you walk you are in awe. The scenery, the complexity, the vibe is on a movie level, this is by far the best game so far.
Starfield looks like a Fallout 4 mod, with instanced space simulation like 15 years ago. There is no vibe and no life to it, the design is dull and outdated, the story sucks. It’s like comparing gold with stones.
Hear me out. Combine them
Nah this YouTuber to real he white but nigga so real I see him as a brother 😂😂😂 00:30 had me dyin 😂😂😂😂
Asmongold’s editors making sure that they get all kinds of malding balding asmongold in there.
Why when it comes to Starfield instead of “ship building” I do hear “shit building”.
SteamCharts on Starfield vs. Cyberpunk is downright pathetic as far as Starfield goes.
Starfield was literally beaten in players by a *patch*. In fact, the hype for the patch alone had Cyberpunk competing with playercounts for Starfield before the patch even released. Post-patch, Cyberpunk mildly beat it, and now that Phantom Liberty is out, Cyberpunk is absolutely dunking it. A DLC for a three year old game is beating a AAA title that was hyped for years from one of those awful developers, like Blizzard, who has an army of simps who would preorder anything even if it was a computer-melting virus.
Starfield is a failure. Bethesda had to brag about the “number of players” by counting every single person who already had Gamepass who installed it once (note: those numbers are completely hidden and thus, it’s almost certain that Bethesda literally just lied about it). You’ll never get data about how many NEW people it brought to Gamepass which is all that matters. Comparing Steam sales to other games on Gamepass, it’s obvious this was not actually the success they want you to believe. I don’t trust for a second that 2/3rds of Steam users are also paying for Gamepass, which is what you’d be required to believe is the case to make their playercount numbers not humiliating. Starfield isn’t even a month old, the drop in player interest was catastrophic.
It’s a terrible game made by a terrible company who I wish to god would just go bankrupt and entirely out of business already.
Learn how to cook a steak
Not even mods can save Starfield. Bathesda gameplay and story telling is just so outdated now. I have zero expectations for ES6
It’s not the same because starfield is 50x bigger than cyberpunk
Cyberpunk is redeemed
I adore both games. Best RPGs ever made until cyberpunk orion and starfield 2 comes out. Or some other insane open world futuristic sci fi RPG by someone else.
To be fair Cohh was an NPC in CP77 but SF is an absolute skeleton of a game. If you had to play one obv. get CP77.
even at launch with how bad the game ran, cyberpunk still looked 1million times better than starfield and had more heartfelt quest lines throughout and a even better story
I love both. Problems with Starfield 1 local map 2 storage boxes don’t share. Problems with cyberpunk 1 Save files are not separated by character.
Neon does the cyberpunk look pretty good but starfield is not in the same leauge as cyberpunk2077 and thats okay both games are fun imho
Comparing to Neon to Night City is wild
Neon is one block compared to whole City
Also other than Neon Core, it’s just empty
It took cyber punk 3 years to get to where it is. Why am I the only person who remembers how dogshit cyberpunk was at release. The game was completely unplayable for like 90% of people.
Sure Cyberpunk is ok now after several updates. 😂
He was basically in the game, of course he’d praise it.
Cyberpunk 2077, I remember its launch, how bad it ran on some systems.
And now, look at that, just…something to behold. A real beautiful looking dystopia.
I didnt even play Starfield and i wasnt really hyped for it anyway. They better should make a new Fallout and Elder Scrolls soon, THEN i am hyped.
Starfield art direction is good, there are exceptional micro details, but Night City design is simply outstanding.
Cyberpunk doesn’t have realistic looking procedural planets tho.
starfield convinced me never to buy another bethesda game again
CohhCarnage is a moron. oh how people forget how bad Cyberpunk 2077 was on release and it was definitly worse than starfield on release on a true comparison. Would I want bethesda to move to a unreal engine? no..yes the creation engine has major flaws but it is a haven for modders which is why starfield will be better.
I play both games, but Starfield is the king of RPGs so far, for many reasons:
-The amazing graphics, the detail in objects and geommetry are on a higher level, and the photorealistic looking planets, a real eye candy. (not all, but most).
-You feel the cities truly alive when walking around, the world interacts with you on many levels: the announcements, the people, the computers, the technology, the robots. You can establish conversation with hundres of NPCS. (short or long).
-The unpredictable events of the world, makes it addictive to keep exploring. (CP2077 city still feels fake, except for the new enhanced police)
-The constant feeling of discovery is also addictive as well.
-The huge amount freedom of choosing what to do next gives you superior immersion. (space combat, exploration, conversations, everything has RPG elements)
-NPCS make the game VERY immersive, they interact with you, they interact with other npcs, and eventually you will find yourself interacting with a bigger group.
-Your companions feel more alive than ever, being aware of what you do, what you say, and what decisions you make.
-there are many different factions, some good, some evil, and they also react given your decisions.
-the wars between factions.
….and those are only to name a few, but enough to make Starfield, undeniably the best RPG experience. by far.
Reply
With any luck , starfail will be playable in a couple years once the modders fix the bugs, crashes and poorly optimized code.
Yeah ship building was cool the first 2 to 3 hours but most the Habs are useless on the ship and their utility is copied like no reason to get a 3×1 living quarters when it actually had the same thing as a 2×1 all in one but the 3×1 does not have research or nav table, IT HAS THE SAME CREW SLOTS they literally have 2 beds in the living quarters taken up by sentient blankets Bethesda (I love them but) Good God they were lazy and some people don’t see it like really dig into it, I don’t see anyone talking about them exiting atmosphere at e3 deep dive they flew from ground through clouds then into space but we somehow got a load screen simulator really baffles me no one’s giving them heat all the dungeons or caves are pretty much the same and they could’ve let you stow in the starboard ship and bring some stuff to your next play through but NOOOOOPE they take everything besides skills so there no real incentive to build outpost and your very limited to what guns you can put on the ship I like starfield but it’s painstakingly clear Bethesda was legit lazy af
Cyberpunk has better cyberpunk cities.
Starfield has better space and ship building.
Weird
Cyberpunk, 2k ultra ray tracing 60 fps..
Starfail.. fsr does nothing, changing settings does nothing, glitches, bugs, crashes, booooooooorinngg.
The most exciting part of starfail is the constant worries about system crashes.
2.0 with path tracing and ray reconstruction looks so fucking good. I just cruise around the city and rake screenshots.
And you’ve changed your opinion on starfield… again
Cyber punk polished up after years ago. Starfield real development happened 1 year ago and was way less bug ridden than cyberpunk. They just have to polish it more like cyberpunk.
And starfield story and content is immense. And the side quest stories are not copy pastas. They are mostly good or decent.
Starfield is amazing. and im problably gona play till Elder scrolls 6, and cyberpunk is a mess.
Its pretty amazing how sheepish Gamers can be, They literally have a a bad rpg compared to another bad rpg. Both games could have actually been much better if the developers actually even looked at their own old games.
Shipbuilding is cool. Too bad the ship is nothing more than a lobby to your next quick travel loading screen.
Everyone forgot cyberpunk was a disaster at launch, and now people forget everything cdpr has lied about.
25 years game development LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO
Dude, I bought both games at launch. And I gotta say this, Starfield is WAY better polished than Cyberpunk at launch
Cyberpunk doesnt just cut out loading screens in “certain buildings” there are no loading screens in the game. The only thing similar you might see is “skip screens” like when the NPCs drive you somewhere in their car, you can fast forward to the destination. But other than that, there just arent any loading screens.
1:10 the key word here is “certain”
I could make the argument that most doors in Starfield can actually be opened lol
fact is its two different games, two different engines, and dont forget CP has had an extra almost 3 years of dev now so would be more fair to compare CP v1.0 to SF v1.0
edit: now about the original statement, lets be real, neon is looking pretty cool but its like one street and nowhere near night city’s looks.
Cars, no loading screen between places, cyberpunk all the way 😅
his game moded right ? like sheehs
yup ship buliding is good, the thing is that is only for a tp lmao
Neon was such a huge letdown. It’s supposed to be this edgey cyberpunk dystopian city yet seems more like Disney’s Galaxy’s Edge. It’s wild that the space KKona town, Akila City, has more edge than megacorp ruled, drug fueled Neon. Everyone is wearing their best non-gendered nun clothing there too.
Tf this man talking about lol ship building and cyberpunk forsure compare 🤡
Starfield is garbage game made by Greedy developers who don’t even like their own game.
Don’t forget cyberpunk was broken as fuck for like 2 years while starfield wasn’t
the dude reaction .. its just so stupid
Does asmongold actually play or do anything? All i see is just clips of him reacting to people saying a game is bad because a character isnt a supermodel or just reiterating that games that came out are awful despite not playing them
Starfield made me appreciate Oblivion more.
Yall gotta be joking😂 cyber punk is still garbage, you guys only play because of the Netflix show
Cyberpunk is garbage
Bro you can barely go in any of the buildings in cyberpunk. At least in neon, every store you can go in; talk to people, buy things, and do quests.
And the cops actually chase you at launch.
Starfield is mediocre, but lets not forget that CP2077 had years to fix its shitty ass release
Again he don’t like the games yet focus around them 😂 biggest definition of hater
No ship building was trash asmond stop.
Never forget that CP2077 what underwhelming/broken at launch… a lot of promises were broken there too. Took them 2+ years to get it to a state where it should have been at launch.
Ship building is fire. Only thing that made me put in 50 hours. Neon is also the best city in the game and looks and feels great.
Zero fucking comparison tho Cyberpunk is on its only scifi level when it comes to setting
I almost forgot how good Cyberpunk was and now it’s finally the game we were all hyped about before it released.
It’s not Jesus who is bald, it’s a serial murderer who found God and wants to get cruzified and you can help him with that. Funny quest, though.
It’s become fashionable to hate Starfield. How do you even do that? How is that possible? Wow.
I love Starfield for getting me to enjoy Fallout 4
Cyberpunk 2020 vs Starfield 2023.
Im so glad that starfield came out since then i have been playing literally anything else since.
Can’t be just both games good on their own? The rest is all subjective. I got a copy of both games with no bugs (no idea how they do it, but it is what it is.) Cyberpunk had a cool storytelling. But after a while like most games it felt repetitive and because of it, it got boring. I would never ever play it again. AND ITS STILL ALL SUBJECTIVE!!!! Starfield had the best story that leads you into new game. There’s no other game that dealt with the new game option like this. It’s simply genius. AND I’ll continue it because I ignored a f. ton of very interesting stories (side quests) because Mirage is coming soon along with the NW dlc. And I’ll continue to play that. BUT AGAIN, IT IS SUBJECTIVE!!! My absolute favourite game that I played multiple times is Death Stranding. Nothing comes close to it. And it is subjective. The story is so much more deeper that I actually watch it all. I skip all the talking in cyberpunk and in starfield too and those games are so simple still that I perfectly understand it. The writers of those games are just sh.t. There are 100 sentences and all you need is 1. (I liked Death Stranding so much that I’ll buy a ps5 for the 2nd one.) And it’s still subjective 🙂
Just a little bit above average is basically saying its a mid game but you might have some good shit happen. Which is to say you might actually fare better playing cyberpunk on launch cause it would be bad but at least memorably even hilariously fun.
Whats crazy is that Starfield has no personality. They had all this time, all the movies, tv shows, fiction to make a cool looking futuristic looking world. And its just absolutely bland lmao.
Crazy how a game released in 2023 makes us appreciate what we had in 2020. So in 2026 are we gonna be like starfield vs newgame? hahaha
Everything in Starfield is poorly designed.
All cities has nothing interesting and feel like empty.
The game should’ve spent more 2 or 3 years before release.
But I’m glad about Bethesda challenged New IP and also I enjoyed the game tbh.
Cyberpunk has 100x more personality and passion put into the project than Starfield, even at launch state. In Starfield all I did was navigate through menus to fast travel everywhere, talk to NPCs with the same default talking animation. There is no such thing as build variety. You get the revenant, you have the best gun that kills everything. Leveling up skills don’t really change your playstyle , you can still mindlessly tank and heal spam through most encounters. Space battles are cool but you really don’t get to encounter them unless its part of a story mission, or you’re looking for them while traveling through space, which is pointless because you just fast travel everywhere.
Yo I didn’t know Peter Dinklage played video games!
Asmon mentions loading screens and I’ve been playing cp77 recently, but I can’t recall any loading screens aside from booting the game and i guess fast travel, I don’t fast travel in cyberpunk so for me it’s a loading screenless experience, I don’t recall any other loading required rly, tho it is annoying how it lets you intereact with a lot of doors just to get a “cannot open” message… but oh well
Starfield is a good game to realize how much better other games are😉
0:32 😂😂😂😂😂
Cyberpunk is better than starfield in a loooot of ways. Like the one really good thing from fallout 4 was building stuff, I really enjoyed that. It was what I probably spent most of my time doing. Starfield has ships and outposts, but everything else from what i’d seen is pretty damn mid, or worse. So a 6 seems really fair, i’d probably rate it lower personally though.
I played cyberpunk 2077 on launch, I did not encounter that many bugs, not even the fun ones. It was disappointing because it was a 7 and not a 9.
Going to Neon just makes me want to go back to Night City.
I am addicted to starfield but there’s no way in hell any of those “maps” even touch what they did in cp2077 it’s one of the top 4 best maps I’ve ever seen in gaming
Starfield is for MODDERS….they made it ugly for you to make it pretty…..sexy…..then they’ll make a porn game out of it at Patreon….
I’ve been playing the same bethesda game from Daggerfall to Fallout 4 and i’m not buying another one until they rewrite the core code. Imagine tricking yourself into thinking a game with WINDOWS XP era code is somehow fun. But Mannequin Trek has such a good Barbie Dream Car build mode!!! cmon man… you could build a dick rocket in Kerbal almost 10 years ago now…
Do you have a mind block against saying “Reskin”? Starfield is a Bethesda core rpg reskin with 20 year old legacy code. say that once please.
Neon is basically the size of a single market area in cyberpunk 🤣
Starfield deserves to get shit on tbh
asmon brings up a good point.
Yes, starfield is clearly above average because the average game is like, an indie game.
In that context i’d rate starfield like, an 8. As in, its better than 80% of the games that exist.
However, for the way it was hyped. The way it was fanboyed as the “baldur’s gate 3 killer”. The way it was meant to be the sequel to no man’s sky. the fact that its a triple a game from a big budget studio with access to the best developers in the world.
And then it gives us *this*
thats an easy 4/10.
If you look at it for what it is. It’s a good game, its better than most games. But if you look at it for what they promised and what they had the capability to make, its pathetic. Especially how they hyped it up as being better than cyberpunk 2077, no man’s sky, and baldur’s gate 3, all 3 of which are superior to starfield in every way, all of which were made by smaller teams than starfield, its absolutely pathetic.
Starfield was a cash grab, because they are too afraid to make elder scrolls 6 because they know they’ll never be able to replicate skyrim. And the funny thing is, Skyrim is a shit game. Skyrim is only the greatest game ever made because of the modding community, all they did was give us the perfect playground/sandbox so that modders could make skyrim actually good, and they did. But now they are afraid to make skyrim 2 because they know they’ll fuck it up. So they gave us this piece of shit instead to test the waters and see if they were ready to actually make the next skyrim.
They aren’t.
Starfiled gives me the skyrim feelings
above average is not a good rating in this day and age
Two different games tho, why compare?
People already forget how bad CBP2077 was ? Npcs T-posing on top of bikes, no physics at all, gamebreaking bugs, cops not reacting at all, visual bugs, save bugs, bugs everywhere. If one think Starfield is worst than CBP2077, they never played both on day 1.
To asmongold, not only did they make Jesus bald, but a Mexican killer with a tatted up face. You gotta do a certain side mission and you’ll learn all about the making of “The Passion “. Epic
It’s a loading screen sim
Starfield is great but if you have 4060 u get like 4 frames on high settings so cyberpunk wins. Feel cyberpunk dose lot of better stuff but it’s a preference some like starfield but once you get to new game plus it feels like burn out.
starfield over here making people appreciate games that came out years before it because now people have perspective on how good they actually were that they are better then a game that came out years after them by a solid margin. Probably the biggest accomplishment starfield has done.
cohh just rides the wave of cancel culture, he really is disingenuous as a person.
Neon city is one street with 4 stores and two buildings with 5 loading screens each. So thats one street, 14 loading screens
David Jaffe says starfield is a top tier game
LoL
Sucks cuberpunk is the last game to use CDPR Red Engine, i love the visuals and unique worlds crafted by the engine with damn near zero loading screens. Theyll use Unreal now and well get games that look like all the other Unreal games. Yes you can modify the living heck out of the engine but every single game still looks and feels the same. I want more Engines on the market not less. Nore competition and more unique worlds, not less.
and Cyberpunk 2077 10x better at Night!
Cyberpunk 2077 is better
Neon COULD have been cooler than that based on the concept art.
But it wasn’t.
Yea star field is a joke but I just with cyberpunk didn’t take years to become good.cyberpunk was buggier and fucked up but it was better at launch than starfield
They need so much more for the outpost building to be really good, like the small amount of habs and modules you have even with skills maxed on outposts is sad. Also the fact that you can’t upgrade the build zone with higher skills is disappointing as well.
Star field is great to play, until you discover No Man’s Sky and stop taking all of Todd Howard’s words for granted.
I think cyberpunk really benefits from its scale, by that I mean that the whole game is one city and it’s outskirts so they were able to just nail down every detail of the city.
I didnt play starfield and for now Im not even gonna try since im waiting for other release but anyone that says that cp77 is a completely shit game and just looking for bugs everywhere is delusional. I mean sure the game is still buggy its nothing compared to the release and its very much playable.
Starfield has 3rd person mode; default winner in my book of FPS motion sickness no matter what CP2077 does.
Neon in Starfield is nowhere near what Night City is.
Starfield is a generic ok game in my book which says a lot. The problem is now, I am NOT looking forward to ES6 at all after playing starfield. Can’t way to see some super dumb down ES game that has all the right check marks to please the .01%. I blame M$ or a lot of this. Wont’ surprise me at all, tons of loading screens, hardly any companions (I want those customs companies back from the skyrim that we can make our own),streamline dumb down.
nah bro who tf thought neon is better than night city? bro needs to get his eyes checked. when i saw the dancing squidwards on the club I lost it
Neon was better, thats how bad that strash was
Vanilla Starfield is fine but mods will make it good
ship building one of the good features is pointless because you don’t fly the ships you load screen into places and have minimal fights then load screen onto a planet :/
It took cdpr 3 years to fix there game and lets not forget theres still a bunch of cut content that was promised like mantis blades being able to wall latch and on top of it cdpr are only doing 1 dlc and the game has had more bugs this update in my 5 hrs of playing than my 150 hours of starfield
Both are good games but honestly cp2077 was the biggest letdown for me
it took cyberpunk 3 years
1:20 im torn about this take.
part of me wants to say,
that’s great and all , but as a game designer, don’t you want something to look the way you envisioned it to look?
The fact that you made a space game doesnt mean that your brain only works on space-game-fumes..
On the other hand, if i’d make a game, i’d feel pretty pressed to know alot about … everything.
Animators need to know anatomy if they wanna animate a cheeta properly in high fidelity where their muscles show, it’s… quite a daunting idea to have to do that to absolutely every single aspect of life.
Architecture, animations, anatomy, science, chemistry, the way light works in order to properly trick someone in case the program doesnt behave the way you want it to, but you still want that result, like.. you need to know everything sometimes to make a game.
Offcourse, in my example im in the delusion that i can make a game by myself, a big team probably has more knowledge but people nowadays know jack shit anyway so..
im 50/50 on if i like this argument or not..
Not gonna excuse the shitshow that was the release of Cyberpunk, however, the amount of work they put into a free update and not making it only available in the upcoming DLC is pretty nice. A TripleA studio releasing a complete overhaul for a single player game for free is hella rare.
Bethesda on the other hand well …… they don’t have to cause modders will do it for them.
Cyberpunk is a good example of. ” games can be fixed”.i mean look at no mans sky. distaster of a launch but now it is one of the most beloved space exploring games out there
00:15 Hahahahahah
lets compare a game with 1 specific focus on night city vs a game with 4 city and few interesting planet. LMFAO these people shitting on starfield is fucking dumb
can you build spaceship?
can you build outpost?
have an excelent rpg stuff?
have better side quest?
Extremely easy to mod?
starfield aim is to become jack of all trade but master none. bethesda game is know to have the most complete world of all open world as far as i know. from building to combat, starfield have a big plus also a big minus. everything seems to be average at best. but fuck it, i want everything in 1 game even if they mediocre at best
Starfield is a 4 at best. Cyberpunk maybe a 10
we comparing starfield to a game that been worked on for a year and polished. 😂
Night City is waayyy more impressive that Starfield cities for sure, but Starfield takes better advantage of them, they are full of quests to the point I actively avoided talking to npcs just to not get more entries in my quest log. In Cyberunk you kinda have to go looking for them
Guys it’s official…this is the best channel on YouTube. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it
You know Corn Cringe or whatever is full of sht when he looked at a city from one angle and concluded it’s a good video game.
Don’t forget asmon is the one that clicks on these videos.
its so sad to see asmon sell out – he used to “call it how it is” and now with these trash games being propped up by “influencers” its obvious that shill companies that give money to them will never stop selling the public trash – the game is shit fallout 76 was shit and alot of “TRIPLE A games” that are making products now are shit and have to take your money and then do something about the lash back – look at payday 3 rn
I love Cyberpunk but the lack of loading screens is a big turnoff
Compare Cyberpunk 2077 from launch day to Starfield at launch day. That would be more fair.
Which is a competition Cyberpunk 2077 would lose absolutely, have people forgotten how crap the game was? It looked worse than a ps3 game.
Comparing a game which took 3 years to fix and everyone and their dog hated even more than Starfield at launch. Suddenly all acting like its not took 3 years and just released comparing it to a new game. The hating is definitely real 😂
Damn. I guess a $100,000,000 makes a big difference.
Cyberpunk 2077 is now a fullgame+
Starfield higher than a 6 tho
I play both, two totally different games and both are good at what they’re supposed to do and be. I hate it when people try comparing apples to oranges.
How long did it take to get cyberpunk to this point? Kso fucking weird man. All these clips are so fucking annoying
Ah the turd 2077 look more polished now.
Back in my day the newer games looked and perform better. 😂
I agree – Cyberpunk 2077 is 100 times better than Starfield.
I want to see a video comparing cyberpunk at release with starfield at release.
Let the sht fest begin
Ok now show cyberpunk at launch
Dw with the amount of empty planets in Stallfield the modders can find a way to put the cyberpunk map somewhere 😂
Please?
Starfield had a far superior launch than cyberpunk because cyberpunk was borderline unplayable but as of right now, cyberpunk is the better game.
the Ai in Starfield is shit as hell.
Dude the first few days of me playing CP was just walking around and looking at things doing side missions , this city looks insane
Is it me or is neon always dark?
Literally not a soul has said neon is better than night city. I feel like he’s just pulling that out his ass to shit on starfield lol
God….. cyberpunk is just sooooo boring to me, like conversations/story makes my brain turn off from boredom….. and this is from a guy who loves the Witcher 3
Starfield fans trying to compare the game to others and then falling short is just hilarious. It’s comparable to Bethesda quality game. Games that requires the players to fix it rather than a decades old studio with millions of dollars of budget. Whilst at the same time, asking for a triple-A price for a quality mildly reaching a double-A. Truly, the game of the year… for Bethesda.
Honestly though, I think people need to compare Starfield more appropriately with actual space games. Although, unfortunately I would say Starfield would probably at the bottom tier as it’s barely a space flight game.
Game with one created city against game with a universe with several planets. Hmm, what will probably look better, fuller, more alive and more detailed ?
Fk that, I pick corpo, I expected some corpo shit, not just a 5 minutes prologue and proceed to be a street kid with a lil bit of snobbish optional dialogue.
I expected industrial espionage, assasination, bribery, divide et impera, instead we got bs.
The creation engine should be retired.
When you have to tell yourself that you like something, before dunking on it… means you’re coping, and the thing you like is garbage.
Imagine comparing a game that takes place in one city to a game that travels all over the galaxy. OBVIOUSLY a big difference. ♿. By the way, both these games are boring in my opinion.
He did not in fact shit on star field and he is infact right
Bro everyone forgot the launch of Cybepunk 2077 and No Man Sky.
They are BOTH trash games… anyone that says otherwise is a sheep.
While the games are in different fields, i think the atmosphere would be a lot less disappointing in Starfield if exploring a city was not bogged down with loading screens
Cohh is just made he isn’t in Starfield lmao.
I just notice 0:16 is this blasphemous easter egg? it’s cool tho.
Cyberpunk does a few things oretty well. Looks nice, has a good amount of unique pkay styles, and surprisngly good level design to accomodate a variety of play styles.
What it lacks is an immersive world, and choices that matter. Its a pretty mid RPG honestly. Nothing revolutionary like GTAV or Skyrim.
If you want AN ACTUAL RPG buy BG3, less instant action (nature of turn based combat) but it far succeeds Cyberpunk in everything else.
This Assmonk guy gets more bald and old every video he posts
Both suck
Don’t get me wrong, I HATE Starfield.
I deleted the game after getting the Narwhal, breaking it down to just the power/jump drive, and building a ship that looked like it belonged in Star Wars. When I realized that more than half my time in the game was just me building the ships, I quit the game and went shopping for some legos.
People often forget that Cyberpunk took two years to even be at this state, at launch was a broken mess for most people and even for people that did not have bugs the game was lacking in almost any aspect that they promissed to deliver, people should stop rewriting the past.
That anyone is comparing Neon to ANY district in SF is just. . .that’s someone who is trying their hardest to stay out of reality. It isn’t even close.
. . .and the comment from someone “Yeah well, the cyberpunk game looks more cyberpunk. . .” is just goalpost moving. If you can’t do it (a cyberpunk corpo-city) then don’t do it.
even tho Cyberpunk is basically fixed, a lot of points Actman showed are still valid, Cyberpunk gets boring after 8 hours
“you can go inside houses without loading screens”
Sure thing asmotroll, like there are tons of places to get inside in Night City, it’s not like almost every building in the game is locked except for quest locations….weird huh??? Also the amount of dynamic objects in the interiors in Starfield…I wonder if this might have to do with the need for loading screens in one and not in the other from a dev perspective…
lol this guy does not even disguise his stupidity anymore
I’m having better FPS on Cyberpunk with pathtracing at ULTRA than 1080p Starfield without raytracing and with 2015 graphics.
Shartfield fangirls malding hard in the comments 💀💀😂
Starfield fanboys are living in a bubble if They think their game is the pinnacle of video games
Ngl Cyberpunk is fucking garbage, couldn’t even have proper spaceship building
State of starfield, one if the worst games ever made 😂
Starfield gameplay above average lol
Cohh is nothing but a generic shill
It may have looked better than starfield but there was more too do and interact with in Neon
Btw if anyone on here is planning on playing phantom liberty I’d suggest you jump back in the normal campaign real quick they changed some of the control inputs and completely redid the skill trees and weapon and gear systems you might want to familiarize yourself with that stuff
it’s a 3
CyberBugs 2077?
Watch out for the reptilians from alpha centari gary
Both games are dogshit. Made by clueless diversity hires.
I don’t know I find Cyberpunk’s graphics while indeed is high… But rather uninteresting and boring??? For how much they hyped it up to be… It’s nowhere near as fleshed out as Witcher 3 and I even tried this game on switch from my friend yet it’s still a really good world to explore…
Cyberpunk is like GTA5 but with cyborgs and a bit more skyscraper… That’s about it..
It’s not Jesus, it’s the 7th Prophet our final Lord and Savior – Asmon.
Cyberpunk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Something just dawned on me – are there any vehicles and traffic in any city in starfield like at all? I saw some footage from neon city and atlantis, but thinking back it all looked like pathways and walkways. No cars, shuttles, trams, carts or forklifts of any kind anywhere => which basically means = no infrastructure = glorified villages in space? Or did I miss something and talking load of crap? (I do know ships land and go, but is it tied to you being around or are they actually flying above cities and such like NMS?)
Tbf, its not fair to judge a game that game out 54 years after another
Starfield isn’t even a bad game. To many pathetic followers though just want to be part of the cool kids club and make fun of it so they are part of the group. It’s pathetic. Twitch has such a hive mind mentality. Might not be your preference but the level of hate people have for it is like bro, it’s just a game relax.
Starfield made me appreciate skyrim’s npc day and night schedule.
The ship building in starfield is cool, too bad a majority of it is a waste of time.
dudes will spend 6 hours on a ship just to do the same fights over and over and haul every resource in the game.
why shit building is censored in chat lol
Starfield makes me want to play No Man’s Sky. No Man’s Sky makes me want to play Eve Dangerous. Eve Dangerous makes me want to play Starfield.
Am i reacting to a reaction of a guy reacting?
Starfield isn’t bad, it’s like Skyrim in Space, but if we are comparing it to Cyberpunk? Yeah, Cyberpunk is better in nearly every aspect in which you can compare those two. Take talking to people for example, the static centered-in-the-middle-of-the-screen NPC’s versus Cyberpunks dialogue design. Or combat mechanics and skilltrees overall, especially now with 2.0.
Starfield feels like a 2012 Game compared to Cyberpunk. Starfield is fun, but feels more like a Skyrim Conversion than anything else, which is fine, but nothing groundbreaking.
They’re both just god awful boring af games.
I rate games on how much I think of them.
5 I don’t if I’m not playing it.
4 below is when I’m not playing I think of it in a negative light, the lower the worse I think it is.
6 up is I think about it while playing or doing other stuff, higher the more I think about it.
The “fuck I wanna play this so badly” while you are stuck at work or something.
I will obviously rate games higher if they work, and are well made.
Starfield, haven’t played but lmao that’s mid 5. I’m not seeing memes, I don’t think bout it.
Cyberpunk 2080 😂
funny how when I said on the stream Starfield looks like shit from PS3. Asmon and chatties replied, “graphism does not matter” …
possible to run on 3790k yet without tweaks?
The problem is the “average” isn’t a 5 anymore.
A comparison of Starfield at launch vs Cyberpunk at launch would be more interesting.
Exactly. Starfield isn’t a bad game, but it’s absolutely not a 10/10 like so many reviewsites were paid to give it.
At the very beginning, the graphics, the voice acting, the feel, it’s a 9.
Then you progress half an hour and see the main story and instantly realize it’s trash, so it becomes a 8 since there’s far more game to to Starfield than the main story (seriously, the main story needs to be modded out, all of it, including the NG+ shite).
Then how badly optimized and Frankensteined the game is starts to become clear and It’s barely a 7.
And then you keep playing and notice more and more how badly written, disjointed, nonsensical and outright lazy a lot of the rest of it is and all you’re left with is a 6.
And it’s above average only because the person/people that did the ship builder should get a raise and the team that created the combat and gunplay are obviously far more competent than anyone else that worked on the game.
And then, you realize that the heavy pulling back on item slots, armor and clothing variety is going to handicap the porting of modded outfits and assets from older Bethesda games for a long while and as a result this game won’t have as good mod variety as quick as the others, for a long ass time. The delay of the release of the mod kit to be a year out, far longer than it was with any previous game, making this even worse.
So it’s down to a measly 5 anyway.
There’s so much potential in this game and so many decisions made that just made it depressingly meh.
He is literlly wearing a witcher shirt
If you think cyberpunk is better than starfield, you need to go through cyberpunks story again and just ask yourself, what the fuck is going on
Asmon does not play games unless he can farm content from it
1:09
“I’ve also heard that in this game you can enter certain houses and not go through a loading screen”
Yeah, every location you can actually enter is totally free of loading screens, we’re so used to Bethesda’s shit that we consider that rare.
3 years of beta still no aim toggle for cp2077
I think its hilarious people compare starfield and updated cyberpunk 2077 on video comparison…. i just watched a video of release cyberpunk vs cyberpunk now.. man that was quite a big difference and if you compare original release of cyberpunk to starfield the difference is so much smaller. I mean cyberpunk is frigging amazing game love it but it was not as good on launch. Shooting on water on release did not even have any splashes on cyberpunk on release version and at least starfield got that on launch.
Will be playing cyberpunk 2077 after i finished starfield. Then i have to look at baldurs gate 3 too after cyberpunk.. man so many great games we are showered this year. Just a bit hard to find the time for all this playing with kids and work etc 😀
Why are people acting like either game is good?
You can make your own ship and not fly it around…great that’s what I always dreamed of. Only an idiot would want to fly his own ship right?
Todd Did It Perfectly Well Its Just Like Skyrim He Learnt It From If I Say ” Starfield Is Perfect Playground For Modders To Do Their Thing Without Any Problem Because Theres So Much Room For Improvement That You Can Do So Much And Say That You Fixed This Game “
0-5 for a game is all bad games. 5-7 is barely playable
Starfield getting so much gate even though it’s really good🤷🏽♂️
It’s just pretty dumb to mention that comparison without acknowledging we are seeing a version of cyberpunk 3 years after release, which would’ve probably never happened if it weren’t for the severe backlash the release got. And even then… 3 years post release? PlayStation network had to enable refunds ffs lmao
Well i don’t truly want to defend Starfield because it has problems and has some poor decisions in game design however even i can’t take this slander when people compare this to Cyberpunk and No Mans Sky like really yall know this game is less then a month old right vs these games that are 3 and 7 years old and they both had disasters for a lunch that took years to fix so ya even i find its sad to defend Starfield but when you use these 2 games to compare it’s just a joke in the end and its funny… ya I’d rather play No Mans Sky over this game anyday but it took OVER 7 YEARS to get 2 this point.
Starfield is great because it made me appreciate Cyberpunk even more.
Starfield is pure trash and everyone who disagrees is delusional af
People get mad at Starfield not being open world but I think it was the right decision. I do think it should be an option you can have though. Shroud said it best “you think you want open world and have to fly everywhere but you would just become bored and fast travel everywhere anyway.” Only a niche part of the player base would enjoy it but the majority would just do what its doing right now.
To that one guy that 6 years for 6/10 game, remember how poorly 2077 was received at launch, and that took 7 years from it’s first teaser to finally release
Even skrim is better than starefield. Pretty sure they could mod ships into skyrim.
I can’t believe the main area in cyberpunk, a game that’s 100 times smaller than starfield, is more polished than one of the many cities/settlements that exist in starfield.
Gets surprised with futuristic Jesus, you better off not watching netflix.
Starfield and Cyberpunk are bad games. Forget glitches, are the stories to either of these games memorable like let’s say Halo or Far Cry 3 or Gears or God of War or Skyrim or Oblivion or RDR1 and 2 or Witcher 3 or Mass Effect?
Because to me, they play like empty sandboxes. Go here, kill enemies, loot trash tier items and some decent items that won’t replace what you have but you can sell it for a lot, go back to quest giver, get XP and money, repeat.
Man. Its been a week and people still milking Starfield content.
Starfield sucks balls, I’d wait 3 more years till I play that game again
Yeah, maybe, just maybe if Starfield spent less time on fulfilling dumbass agendas like pronouns and focused on actually creating a game that has a heart, the cities and neon lights would be amazing and not everything would be a loading screen.
Asmon will stop at nothing to never admit other people can like a game he doesn’t like
How was Cyberpunk at launch though? How quickly people forget.
The shipbuilding is indeed pretty cool. Sadly it’s also pretty much the only thing it has going for it and you can definitely see that shipbuilding is what Bethesda spent the majority of their time on (even though it’s just the same mechanics as from the settlement building in Fallout 4 but with prefab modules surrounded by greeblie bits).
That said, I’m stoked to go back to Night City once the expansion comes out. I know 2.0 has already released but I’m waiting until everything is in (plus I’m also still playing Baldur’s Gate 3 right now). No time for playing Shipfield. Maybe once Bethesda has released all the DLCs and have a Complete Edition on sale during a Steam Summer Sale I’ll buy it.
Bro said shipbuilding is good nah not even you cant actually customize the interior besides dropping items, you cant select where you want doors between habs and lord forbid you have a mult level ship forget the pointless ladders just jetpack ah yes the immersion of having more options on how you get to a second level on your ship doesnt exist. Shipbuilder to me is the equivalent to a dumbed down version of space engineers
This is before Jackie died. Must be starting over.
CP2077 NPCS also look so much better in conversations etc than Starfield
Starfield feels incomplete and empty. There is no civilization. They promised cities, yet only delivered just few small towns. Yet wherever you land on any moon there is always an huge same building in 1 km in any direction. They didn’t care about filling the world with content. In 8 years of development they likely done location in just couple of months and fired everyone to save money.
Why not compare it with No Man’s Sky? Same space game
I own both so I don’t need to compare. I like both games anyway.
3 years later it is ready to be enjoyed lol
So much copium from Bethesda fanboys saying oh neon is only a small part of the game, yeah well all of Cyberpunk is better than Starfield not just Neon lol
Neon utilises sound better.., the speakers for each shop is cool, and there is more to interact…
…
but just “pure visuala”, Cyberpunk looks better (though, Neon has nice effects too)
Thats the issue, it does SOME things good.
-It does ship building really good
Yes, kinda, its just modular building, but there are still limitations.
If you want a GOOD ship building game, there’s Space engineers, Dual Univers and Starship Evo, NOW THESE are GOOD shipbuilding games, and they have actual Planets in it…
-It as action combat
Yes, like …70% of the other games out theren and most of them HAVE better or at least more interesting combat.
-You can explore!
-Ish… somewhat, if you call “exploration” going through loading screens every 3km with the 4 same POI’s and the 5 same enemies that has waaaaayyy too much health…
Once again, OTHER games does it better
-It as story and NPC’s and quests
Like the 4 TES/Fallout games before and like 1000’s of other games out there…
And thats the thing, there’s nothing revolutionary or so intricate or unique to THIS game, that makes me think, “damn should i play this Game, or play Starfield instead?”
Starfield is a game where they put a bit of everything, but din’t bother much to make sure that all of this felt connected or coherent, and not only that but the stuff they took from other games, isn’t even that good or interesting…
I’ve noticed that since the game’s release, i’d rather Boot up Skyrim or even Oblivion again, than play starfield.
Lol, im looking at this, and hearing the voice acting. Then i think about AC6. “Never thought I’d be rubbing shoulders with the liberator of Rubicon.”
People saying cyberpunk launch was better then starfield launch are out of they’re minds.
For a moment there I caught “shit” building, but “ship” building. If CP2077 has customizable vehicle then we can compare them based on that point alone. However, I think we are playing the different game. People are just comparing a small bit and make it A vs B while they forget they are not doing the justice for the other things. Starfield can be compared with NMS which have the most ideal comparison of all games we had. CP should be compared mostly with GTA and so on. 😀
You better show this comment to asmond bc starfield is the only game carnage wasn’t in. He be right in this but he’s a shill
Playing Cyberpunk 2.0 vs playing one day one a few years back is such a huge difference. Glad to see they really turned such a big L into a W
I’m sorry they released Cyberpunk 2077 on PS4 and had game breaking bugs that held up my game for like 3 days. I have only had minor bugs in Starfield. I have thought about reloading my ps4 version of it and seeing if they fixed that bug yet.
I’ve been playing elden ring from the start of 1.03.
I took a small break from it for tunic and armored core.
Now I’m waiting
Night city to me is like a beautiful, extravagant, but dead environment. There’s nothing that keeps you on your toes when exploring. To be fair, starfield is the same, besides the occasional space encounter. Random events are heavily underrated
Starfield made me buy cyberpunk 2077
Confirmed Asmon is the 2nd coming.
Neon was like 5% of cyberpunk
Its probably the interactions you get and the vibe of a no sunlight Neon that’s better.
he gave d4 an 8.5 so i can only take his ratings so serious
Cyberpunk was a catastrophe at launch and now it’s getting some actual appreciation. Starfield will get there in time. I think it has had a better launch from what I’ve seen
lol, same with No Mans Sky. People is in need to compare years old games with a game that came out a month ago. On release, everyone, and I mean everyone, hated on NMS an Cyberpunk. Now, years after, is the best thing around just to trash Starfield.
The Ascent does “cyberpunk city” the best IMO. But considering the setting of Cyberpunk 2077 is a not so distant future, maybe what we see in game is actually appropriate (it doesn’t look that much different to current day’s mega cities).
Yeah but in at least in neon you can talk to almost all the npcs
People who think that neon looks better than night city are: absolutely brain damaged, suck todds wiener 24/7 and never played a good game in their entire life.
Like seriously, comparing neon to night city is like comparing literal diarrhea to a diamant, lol.
Starfield is complete trash
what makes this even better.. its all in an open world too. You can use elevators and shit all without loading screens meanwhile in starfield its”lets fast travel from the outside to the inside of my ship. Niceeeeeeeeeee.
Both are still bad. We’re just comparing bad to mediocre (Cyberpunk) to terrible (Starfield).
Dude starfield is trash. It would’nt even be big if it came out 10 years ago.
Todd howard sucks and is completely delusional. The story sucks and makes no sense from the get go. No good planets just same old crap over and over, life forms suck no other alien species. Its lack luster and gets super boring very quickly. Collecting resources seems pointless its just not a well thought out game? Outfits suck and major clipping probs and i could go on for ever!!!
“In Starfield you can build ships…”
Yeah but what the hell do you do in your ship besides serving as a hub for more loading screens?
Got back into cyberpunk this week. It’s better
I picked up cyberpunk because of how disappointed I was in Neon (and the cities in Starfield in general). Seems like the best time to jump in as well with the 2.0 update to cyberpunk.
Compering these two is like compering a highschool athlete to a college athlete. One has had more time to train then the other. Of course cyberpunk is better, it’s had more updates and time to get polished. StarField will probably be way better then it is now, given the same amount of time.
I just tried out cyberpunk, it’s still a buggy mess …
nobody has ever said “i like starfield” without immediately following with “but”
Starfield has better ship building than Cybderpunk
Starfield is a mixed bag, but I enjoy it for the most part. But the city Neon is full of assholes though for no discernable reason, and I think it should nuked from orbit, along with Ryujin HQ. At least in Night City in CP2077 people are assholes for an obvious reason – basic survival.
6 out of 10 reduces to 3 out of 5.. he said i give it a 6 because it’s a little bit better than average lol
Asmongold’s channel is now 100 percent Starfield content
The more u play starfield the more disappointed u get.
Bro 2077 was unplayable at launch gtfo
The ship builder IS cool, which makes it all the more sad that space combat sucks balls and that there really is moo space exploration, or any real reason to to stay in space in your ship.
“There’s this weird discussion going on saying that Neon in Starfield is better.” Discussion? It’s called coping. Use copium responsibly people.
Me when I wake up
Personally love both games for different reasons. But ill wait on cyberpunk until the mods work with this update lol. I want my booba everywhere.
Playing Starfield for a bit, then coming back to 2077 for a third playthrough made me realize how FUCKING AMAZING Cyberpunk looks and plays.
no comparison. the fact you have to go through 4 load screens MINIMUM to travel from a location on a planet to another location on a different planet without dumb workarounds is borderline unacceptable for a full price AAA game in 2023
Zack you will play cyberpunk and wonder why you played the others lol. Itll be that much better.
Starfields best feature was the refund option.
Starfield is actual slop
Love both games!
this guy went from “i can’t rate it, i’m not the right audience” to ” starfield is a 6″. Finally speaking your mind huh.
I swore didnt he…do 10 vids on this
i haven’t been addicted to a game like cyberpunk since dark souls 3🔥🔥
Asmonjesus 2077
Both games are shit, pearls before swine.
Starfield gampeplay : 5/10
Starfield ship building : 10/10
I launched Oblivion and Skyrim for the first time in 6 years thanks to Starfield and had way more fun in it. Finished Oblivion and didn’t really get far in Skyrim because I started playing modded halfway through.
people saying neon city is better than night city needs to get their brains examined.
Even with the HD rework mod, Starfield is miles away from Cyberpunk
Like CohhCarnage commitment to the greenscreen. Full-on weatherman production with pointing at stuff that makes sense from our POV.
How about a cyberpunk on release vs starfield 😂😂😂😂😂😂.
People forgot easily that when Cyberpunk released it was the same as how Starfield is now.
Simply don’t buy games on Day1, No Man Sky’s docet.
it will be better, 2077 got the same flak. im waiting for a years worth of patches. at 45 doll hairs it wasnt like expensive. yes xbox pass made it 45 bux.
the world of cyberpunk is Night City, in Starfield, Neon is just one of multiple cities. So it’s not really fair comparing it
6 is good now, if bro had given 6 couple weeks ago, he would be in gaming hell with that one IGN guy, who had the nerve to officially rate starfield as 7,5. 😂😂
Cyberpunk is 9,3, starfield is 5,7.
People who legit think the cyberpunk city intro is amazing are brainlets. It’s one scene meticulously designed to look good right off the get-go meanwhile the rest of the city looks like junk.
Has this dude seen any yakuza games?
I just can’t take anyone who compares the two titles seriously. One is a tech demo, a nice detailed map with good graphics, where it’s fun to walk around for a bit. The other is an ACTUAL PLAYABLE GAME. Like, a game where there are things to do & people to interact with. A game where missions aren’t just “go here & shoot these lobotomized AI” , where there’s actual customization for your character, ship, outposts, where your decisions (and character) actually have impacts on things other than causing a different voice line/cutscene to play. The ONE THING Cyberpunk managed to do well outside of its graphics is story, and even that’s just Pondsmith’s lore being re-written.
Of all the think he notice about night city is poster of bald jesus 😅
Mr Cohh “i have a NPC named after me in Cyberpunk” Carnage
For me Starfield is completly unplayable. Every time I go to make a character it asks me what my pronouns are so I have to turn the game off in disgust.
Two trash games 🥱
its not even a competition
Can’t wait to be able to watch your channel again bro. As soon as your done posting bs. Hope it’s soon.
Now cyberpunk 2.0 is out. To me, Cyberpunk 2077 rape Starfield on the ground.
Atomic Heart is better than both
hilarious to think after all that starfield is still the better game by a landslide, cyberpunks story and characters are so damn lame and boring but i am excited to play with the new path tracing when my 4070 shows up, gotta get my money’s worth out of cyberpunk somehow because the gameplay sure as shit didn’t do it for me ahaha
Very keen to get in to Phantom Liberty
I mean Cyberpunk’s map, content and main focus is the city.
It’s nuts ppl think Starfield looks better than CyberPunk. Just…huffing an ocean’s volume of copium.
btw this guy is a character in cyberpunk he is the homeless prophet guy (the appearance not the voice)
I enjoy Starfield too. It’s hurt greatly by the slow start but I am liking it more and more
cyberpunk had a worse launch that starfield although it had more content.
Starfield is a sandbox to be filled by modders, it was literally tought around that
the crew system so that the hundred companion mods all feel useful because you can send them to ship outpost
the NG+ so that mods that need new game to work can still work while you keep some form of progression
the large universe so that no 2 mod collide togheter and there is space for any number of new settlment and cities
then will come the ship part mods the outposts mods weapon mods
mods that add diversity to randomized dungeons etc
yeah modders can (and probably will) turn starfield into a great game.
because bethesda is too lazy to do it themselves xD
These 2 games are not comparable! Love both but enjoy starfield atm little more than cp 2077 2.0
Yes, night city is much larger than Neon. Night city also has nothing fun to actually do or interesting stories or people comparatively so I get what they’re saying.
2077 still coping 3 years later.
Cyberpunk is superficially amazing but the closer you look the worse the game is..
Mark these words
Starfield will have a longer tail because of this Starfield holds up far better to scrutiny
Starfield is not the prettiest but its far deeper in its world design
With mods Starfield will eventually be a 10. Thats the big difference.
Its not even close 😂
But cyberpunk is tiny. It’s map is small
at some points, starfield looks photorealistic, in interiours when i comes to doors and stuff but npc far away, are such a blurry mess, that it looks like ps3 level. thats why i dont get, that i eats up hardware as it does
I can attest that Starfield ship builder is infinitely better than Cyberpunk 2077 ship builder, you are absolutely right there asmongold, W for starfield
Lol give starfield a couple years too
It’s the cuck war, arguing about two unfinished games that mislead there audiences is crazy.
Thats what she said asmon
starfield deserves to get smoked… it feels like a game stuck in the mid 2012’s
Cyberpunk is breath taking
CP2077 got update 2.0. Go play it.
if starfield wasn’t made by bethesda you know that shit would be a 60 on metacritic 😅😅
Both games are trash
Starfield is a solid 6; but once the modding community got their hands on it 8.5. Modding Community does wonders its amazing.
Asmon is NOT a gameplay andy lolololol he is the exact opposite. If it has titties and ass and he can throw money at it, he plays it
Neon is kinda Night City. Once it grows up. But right now, it’s still an infant. Give modders time let it grow up.
A game over 3 years old that nobody gives a shit anout that everyone already decided they are never finna play vs something that bramd fuckin new 😂 what a fickin joke this youtube gaming community is becooming
Of course Cyberpunks City look better but it is just only this city. Starfield is about much more. I tried to play Cyberpunk around 3 times and couldn’t do it. It is annoying to blast several magazines into one enemy and it doesn’t die and the bugs are pure horror. 3 Times with so much time in between and the game was still broke. Starfield is on a absolutely other level I had only few not really concering bugs and the whole genre is different. You can’t compare them really.
Despite 2077 issues on launch they devs actually did put into work on world detail and make combat interesting. The launch of course $&@?ed them and they needed more time but it shows what they wanted and we fully see that now.
Starfield is good but you can tell Bethesda played if extremely safe on what features to add and what they do. Hence why it doesn’t truly feel out there compare to say this and even fallout world.
Starfield def has shit building, ooops I misspelled that
I want cdpr to add like a walking/cinematic mod set moving speed to just walk around the city without the set movement or speed 👍
Cyberpunk 2077 came out in 2020, Starfield came out in 2008, it’s not fair to compare games from completely different console generations.
Wait… it turns out Starfield launched in 2023, it just looks and plays like it came out in 2008.
Honestly if i buy this expansion and V still has to die in the end ill never play a single player game ever again. Its bad enough its single player, but no end game? But you have countless abilities to unlock and shit. Make absolutely no sense. The game was brilliant until you have to die and cant even progress your character anymore.
Now compare Starfield with the release version of CP2077💀
We are gonna be eating good bois. Three years guys. Three years.
There are no loading screens only cinecmatic storyline stuff. You can freely travel where ever you want. No loading screens!!!
This also isn’t mentioning the fact that Cyberpunk is much more optimized and technologically ahead than Starfield.
starfield is an outdated, overrated game
Its nice cyberpunk is fixed but the bad thing is this is still gunna keep the unfinished games coming on repeat. Punish devs with closure or keep complaining about bad games.
Starfield does a lot of things ok. It’s more of a bundled package of an experience, that’s good/ok for the most part. Nothing really amazing.
The cities are so small in Starfield. I mean, how many people are even alive? A few thousand in the entire universe?
Cyberpunk does immersion very well imo. When the game came out, I played a lot just moving around the map on my bike, god with the music I was so happy. Wasn’t perfect obviously as we know but I can’t wait for the new DLC/Expension to replay this.
It’s a Bethesda game… 5-6 is exactly where most of their games are, yes Skyrim included (especially Skyrim).
Imagine comparing a game that just released to a game released almost 3 years ago. Let’s compare again in another 3 years
Yes, but can you play cyberpunk 2077 in third person? Comparing only 1 thing in 2 games to decide who is the best is stupid.
Everything in starfield feels so plasticky, the people, the enemy ai, the alien wildlife, the dialogue, literally everything. Cyberpunk is the opposite, if you pull out your weapon, npcs will freak out. Feels like you’re actually interacting with the environment
The difference is I could enjoy Neon on launch but couldn’t enjoy Night City on launch, it’s taken them 3 years to fix the game post launch for people to get to really enjoy it…
Starfield just released, cyberpunk has had sooo many patches and updates, it was worse then starfield at the start.
“It’s not even the same game”
*Genius*
Cyberpunk has almost no loading screens. Its really a technical achievement for a open world this big.
Remember, Todd went into the past to release starfield into the future.
Cyberpunk is a great game, but I think the comparison Cohh makes here is kinda facile. For one, that exact spot he is standing in is probably the best and most impressive Cyberpunk 2077 looks – that first vertical vista when you leave your block. There’s nothing wrong with that, but if you’re just going to animatedly point at that vista as evidence of something, I think it behooves me to point out that Starfield can look plenty impressive in lots of places.
Secondly, CP2077 is game that has had years of updates to make it better, after the quality at launch was so legendarily awful that the game actually got REMOVED from the PlayStation store for a while. Something that was pretty much without precedent for such a big game. The game often ran in single digit framerates on some of the platforms they released it on. Tons of features they talked a big game about pre-release were straight up missing, and some of them still are even now.
I actually do think CP2077 in 2023 is definitely the more polished overall game, but the two games are also offering very different experiences beyond the broad basics of “both have guns you use to shoot guys and take place in the future”. I certainly don’t think CP2077 is in some other league comparatively, and as a disclaimer I’ve probably put 200 hours in both games on PC.
Starfield has some problems, but the hate boner Asmon’s community has for the game continues to baffle me.
Cyberpunk has been more than playable since 1.6
It’s always been an insanely good looking game.
When I saw Neon I thought it was a very cheap knock-off of Cyberpunk – I mean, the colours are similar. When I was a child I’d play games like cops and robbers with my friends – over dinner I’d recount these tales of daring do, thrills and spills to my parents…in my head it was all so exciting and seemed so real…of course it wasn’t, we were a few scruffy kids in the garden with a water pistol. Hearing some folk talk about starfield reminds me of those times. I don’t think it’s a bad thing – fun is fun, after all…theatre of the mind is still theatre.
I LOVE Starfield. Neon was very disappointing.
Jesus dawg, the fuckin amount of complaining you do constantly is insane. You have to hold a world record for it.
Dw it gotten very buggy after the new update, seen people float, AI cant drive for shit, the usual bugs from 3 years ago
The Starfield fans malding over Cyberpunk in these comments are hilarious
They had to put buildings behind loading screen because of the wall breaches, they known you’d get to the chests so it makes it harder. Seems like a strange engine limitation 😂
Starfield is awesome cause you could actually play it when it came out
Bro I can’t with people sometimes cyberpunk came out 2 years ago and startfield came out 3 weeks ago how in the little brain cell are u going to compare that bruh
Yes lets compare a game that’s been out for years against a game that released 3 weeks ago because that’s a fair comparison. Cyberpunk is only getting attention because people are idiotically comparing it to Starfield and want to cope that cyberpunk is good. Cyberpunk vs unmodded Starfield, Starfield wins. Cyberpunk vs. modded Starfield; BISH PLEASE people are gonna have Tamriel as a planet and will allow you to play Skyrim in Starfield along with Fallout NV!! Cyberpunk is just that, a punk b!tch of a game that’s gonna age like fine milk while Starfield becomes what Skyrim was and more, and that’s a fact.
Ahem, let me introduce you to Cyberpunk 2077’s biggest bug. Your character can be nude in the menu, but as soon aa you leave the menu, the gane automagically glues underwear to you character. I’m fine with having no nudity for my character, my issue is *CONSISTENCY.* Either HAVE nudity, or DON’T have nudity. Don’t have some weird half and half system. This is your daily Cyberpunk 2077 PSA.
id say “average” in gaming is a 7 and not a 5. a “5” is a failure even though its supposed to mean average
Outpost building is a joke. Bethesda learned nothing from Fallout 4 and its mods
Funny how people now think Cyberjunk 2077 is a “masterpiece”. Very funny (sad)
I do think Neon in Starfield is wonderfully crafted. However, with that being said, Cyberpunk does it on a larger scale and, frankly, does it better. It shouldn’t be a direct comparison as both games are entirely unique. Cyberpunk is expected to be better because, well… that’s the game!
Game engine Lighting Loves static non moving objects. they struggle with like dynamic.
One thing I will say, it’s not fair to compare modern day cyberpunk to starfield. Compare cyberpunk at launch on console to starfield on console.
starfield in another 3 years will probably look much better too, Cyberpunk on launch didn’t look this good
obviously any individual city in Starfield isn’t gonna be the same scale as Night City…seeing as how the ENTIRE GAME is just set in one city. absolutely asinine comparison. And the cities in both games feel just equally lifeless and static. However, starfield has tons and tons of other content whereas Cyperpunk is just the one city. At some point endless blocks of the same glowing buildings becomes boring too. Now, with the 2.0 update I’m sure cyberpunk is much better than launch, but still. These games arent remotely comparable.
They give outpost and ship building then gave ng+ which is literally for nullifying these features and u get one of the strongest ship in ng+ which is very op and not modular at all so u cant change anything on it. Very dumb design choice.
Hey Bethesda 2006 call they want ur game back 😂
muh graphics!
i too think that ship building in starfield is better than ship building in CP2077
I love that he likes starfield but once he started his new cyberpunk playgthrough he kept comparing how better cyberpunk is
I just don’t get the whole cope around Starfield. Why has everybody preface every statement about it with”Though I enjoy Starfield,…”?
It’s a bad game from a bad company, that is infamous for buggy undercooked games and recently also micropay hellscapes.
Seriously, your loyalty is misplaced.
6/10? It’s 8/10 at its lowest.
What they did really well in starfield was ship building , side quests, and the small events. The main story is meh. Outposts they need to patch so it works better. What is good in starfield is what is good in pretty much all their other games. Improvement on other stuff is minimal or non existant. I have loved they game, but it has clear problems.
remember when starfield came out and IGN gave it 7/10 everyone started malding?
I’m sure cyberpunk is a good game now, but it lost its chance with me. If I play a game that broken on release, then I simply can’t get back into it. Starfield is playable and any future patch is welcome.
Both garbage ass games
I mean even a starfield hating individual such as asmond can admit it’s better then the average shlock we’ve been inundated with as of late
Isnt Bethesda’s whole thing is to make games that are easy to mod and then let the mods make the game cool? 🤷♂️😂
Dumb. That city is dead as dead.
Polska Górom
Cyberpunk 2077 looks absolutely breathtaking with the new visuals and update. Can’t see a game matching it for some time. Maybe Alan Wake 2 will give it a run for it’s money.
The ship building and outpost building is definitely better in Starfield than it is in CP2077
The city in cyberpunk is nice till you realize that 99% of these buildings can’t be entered and going inside a place is usually for a quest or a rare find
2.0’s biggest problem is they added level scaling.
You just don’t do that in an RPG if you want to be an.. RPG. Absolutely destroys the sense of power progression.
As someone who finished and enjoyed Cyberpunk, I can say that while the futuristic city is beautiful, there wasnt much to explore. You dont actually get to enter most places, and the ones you do are either stores or buildings with enemies. Its like a beautiful vase that is nice to look at but empty inside.
Who the fuck said Starfield is better then Cyberpunk 2077 lol
Nice duel, both games suck. But yeah Cyberjunk looks way better and it´s also way better optimized.
If you enjoyed Fallout 4, a game that came out in 2015, then you’ll enjoy Starfield. Because it’s the same game, same engine, just IN SPACE.
Watch Dogs 2 came out 7 years ago and it has a better world and NPCs than Starfield. Kinda wished that Ubisoft could remaster it.
I love how Asmon points out that a shitstorm is coming. This is classic Adulting 101.
Starfield is a great game if it came out in 2013. It’s extremely dated for a 2023 release which is the problem.
I hear Garfield way too many times.
Why is shit censored on chat?
Starfield is as demanding as Cyberpunk with ray tracing on, while looking worse than Cyberpunk without ray tracing. In fact, it’s more taxing on the cpu than Cyberpunk on path tracing, which is just ridiculous.
No,but I unironically love Night City. It can get repetitive,however,just the ambiance,the sound cues,the way you feel driving down Japantown on your brand new Arch Nazaré,listening to Chet Baker *IS* godlike. I`m actually putting off completing the main quest so I can play it when Phantom Liberty releases.
Cyberpunk is like if Bethesda finally changed their game engine
seen some of these conversations as well and people are fucking bling. currently playing 2077 with 2.0 update, pathtracing, DLSS quality, FG On and it is looking absolutely NUTS.
Starefield looks like a game from 2010. that there is a conversation about it is just proof, that people, especially console players are total garbage. never seen any real graphics xD
Cohh ignoring the fact that cp2077 was dogshit on release with missing features
Big reason online that Microsoft buying Bethesda that games become better?
I guess I am completely confused about the debate……Comparing a very small niche area or segment of Starfield. To a entire world, devoted to that small niche area? I must have missed something.
you should play X360 Banjo Kazooie game before you allow yourself to talk about proper vehicle building
Yeah only took CD-Red 2 years to make Cyberpunk 2077 the way it should’ve been on launch.
I love how everyone is gold-fish braining on Cyberpunk…can we please all think back on 2077 1.0? It launched in a state far more rough around the edges than Starfield…like WAY worse. Give Starfield a juicy 3 years of additional time and then compare it.
I had a beefy PC back then when 77 launched and man was it bad. Half the stuff didn’t work, half the graphics didn’t load. Busted animations everywhere.
Yes. It looks super amazing NOW…now that NPCs stopped T-Posing through the scenery all the time and finally react to guns and whatnot (and stop randomly despawning).
3 years for a working police system.
I am not saying this in defense of Starfield, either. It’s rough and I expected better…but letting CDPR off the hook and now heralding it as some glorious achievment of gaming when it launched as little more than a con, just a step above No Mans Sky. L take.
Asmongold remarks on “bald Jesus” as if ***HE’S*** not “bald Jesus”.
Blizzard and Bethesda are like 100year old grandpas with fake joints and not able to go up stairs and are constantly falling.
Blizzard and Bethesda has no OG devs left anymore, no creativity and fake agenda and on top of that fake happy faces. Everyone who expected Starfield to be good would believe their 100 year old grandpa could jump up 10 stairs without landing on their heads behind the spot right where they attempted to climb those stairs. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Lets compare cyberpunk release version and starfield
the moment i finished the main quest in Starfield i uninstalled, new game plus is trash, the side activities are trash, outpost building is intentially cumbersome intended to squeeze out hours from gamer just so Bethesda can brag abt how ppl are playing it for 1000 hrs. Not to mention the only one outcome for the main ending killing all incentive to do a 2nd playthrough. Compared to Skyrim and Fallout 4, Starfield is a major stepback both in quality and content.
Not to excuse the unacceptable state Starfield is in but people need to stop comparing launch Starfield to after-multiple-major-patches Cyberpunk. It was just as bad as Starfield on launch.
Its funny because im infinitely more bored playing Cyberpunk after beating it than Starfield after beating it.
Funny how two games can be better at different things.
ahhh nothing like comparing a action/adventure game to a Space scifi RPG lol…. Gamers are so fuckin weird nowadays, OF COURSE the game taking place in the universe of Cyberpunk 2020 looks sexy versus the game that has always stated it is a NASAPUNK space rpg.
I thought he was saying sh*t building, lol.
On console the game looks like dogshit
the ship building is pretty bad at least from a micromanaging view, meaning i dont have control over where habs connect and which “doors” are there or not
I’m not proud of how long it took me to realise Asmon was saying “ship building” not “shit building”
Shit building?! Oh, **ship** building!
funny how ign score SF 7/10, (7 good) when in reality it 6 (above average) at best. and people still got really mad at ign.
It is a quantity vs quality. Cyberpunk has a focus on a city and making that feel real. Stanfield has to build wider with the number of planets/locations. Each has their own benefits.
Trash vs trash
Cyberpunk and Starfield are going for completely different aesthetics.
midfield 6/10
Bethesda games put me to sleep. Tried to play Prey & I fell asleep.
Starfield is only not 10/10 cause other better games exist. okay that sounds dumb but you get what I mean lol
It’s crazy because I played Cyberpunk day 1 and had close to no bugs and generally an amazing time playing. About to start a new run today
3 at best graphics mediocre 2011 fan boy hyped but hopefully it gets updated an turns onto your 6
Night citys just a Dress set tho. You dont interact with the city at all
Starfield Special Anniversary 3rd Release Upgrade Edition will look better, just wait and see.
But in all seriousness, Starfield isn’t the best graphics, but I still like what they did across the board. Going to mars has a kinda Total Recall feel, Akila gives off some Fallout vibes, New Atlantis is a nice luxurious setting, and Neon although not the best cyberpunk depiction, is still a good one. They covered a lot of bases in a single game instead of having one continuous theme across the board, so you can feel like you’re experiencing different worlds. Can’t wait to see how modders expand even more.
starfield is like a 4 tops lol
Asmon plays WoW hating on bethesda is wild
Asmons chat is so dumb.. “2.0 is amazing”, literally the same graphics as 3 years ago.
The faction quest lines I think are the best thing about Starfield. finished up the UC faction today. Last one I have is Crimson fleet, gonna do that this weekend.
Neon is one of my favorite parts of Starfield, no question. Care to know why? Because it *reminds* me of Cyberpunk 2077, lol. Neon is the cyberpunk sampler platter, Night City is the full course meal.
I have no idea why people forgave cyberpunk so easily when the company that made it actively lied about so much about their game before releasing one of the buggiest games ever while telling game journalists that they cant use their own footage for their reviews since they knew how broken it was.
Why would it be ironic Asmon?
I still love how Asmon is complaining about all the loading screens in starfield, despite knowing its running on the same engine Bethesda has been using for over the last 20 years.
Starfield is poo poo garbage.
Ok, so you give it a six out of ten right…considering what we know modders will turn Starfield into when looking at ALL the experience enhancing things modders did with ten year old Skyrim (original powers, shouts, spells, races, enemy types etc), at least tell me it’s the easiest, most solid, most applicable and full-bodied six you’ve ever given out….
Game about space, yes, right, a empty space with the same formula of “bandit camps” since fallout 3 and with really no interesting things happening in space
Starfield max 6/10 – I had a problem to play longer than 4h.
What kind of warped perception of ratings do you need to have to say that a 6 is “above average”? 60% on a test is bordering a fail. Most people wont even consider watching a movie rated under a 7.0. A 6 is not “above average”, a 6 is dog shit.
starfield like skyrim before it is an agressively mid game.
they nail the themes but everything else is awful; the menus suck, the powers are boring and the game is a Bugthesda Fiesda
everyone in skyrim goes stealth archer mage bc the melee combat is absolute garbage
Yeah but Cyberpunk was dogshit on launch, and Starfield is the least buggy BGS game. Also Starfield has a full ship customizer, and CP2077 doesn’t even let you fucking paint cars lmao
I just love how these people make starfield vs cyberpunk 2077 videos .
like don’t they remember how CP77 was at lunch?
why are you comparing the state of starfield at lunch with CP77 after getting multiple patches in a long time , its just weird.
Wish he would play cyberpunk
You don’t buy bethesda games for gameplay. Like at all. You buy them for story and questing. If youre buying it for gameplay youre the wrong audience
5.5 out of 10 for Starfield. So unpolished it will never shine with a light. At this point it needs heavy mods to make it look good. The Skyrim modding community is its only hope. Imo sorry.
Hey, to anyone replaying/still playing CB, I imagine most mods have been broken with this new update?
Im a big fan of both games, and I find it hilarious that a simple comment made by a game review no one actually cares about made the internet spurg out and start comparing a typical BGS bugfest game to CP2077, even though CP277 was beforehand the literal posterchild for what not to do as a developer in terms of lying in the market, bad consumer practices, falsifying gameplay & reviews, shitty launch, mediocre gameplay design, etc. A year ago hating CP2077 was fun, now its incredible bc a youtube channel made a comparison. Gotta love the internet.
Just started playing Cyberpunk after playing a lot of Starfield. And honestly im having more fun on Cyberpunk. Glad I never played it when it was a broken mess lol. (Got it on sale too)
*_50 and below is fail, 70 -79 is average; 60 is not average, it’s below average._*
Cyberpunk’s release was a disaster. It’s been a shit 3 years. Stop your bullshit.
Cyberpunk is another game like NMS that has redeemed itself for me. Starfield won’t be redeemed due to modders fixing the game instead of Bethesda
Yeah the ship building is cool. Too bad it’s just for a load Screen/ fast travel hub
This guy plays and likes Diablo and wow. His opinion on good games is irrelevant
Is everyone forgetting that CP2077 was also a pile of absolute dogshit when it was released? Are we gonna give Starfield the same leeway where they get 2-3 years to finally make their game playable and then we all start praising it the same way?
Its been a long time waiting, but Cyberpunk 2080 finally came out boys.
People comparing 3 year old fixed Cyberpunk to launch day Starfield. Cyberpunk on launch got shit on by EVERYONE. It was hot garbage. Starfield got shit on by Sony fanboys only. 😂
Editor can you please answer me, why are videos on low volume, every time i watch video here, i have to increase volume…
Cyberpunk is still the not the rpg that advertised itself as such
Anyone who thinks Starfield looks better than Cyberpunk isn’t on copium – they’re just dumb.
And yet, Starfield still has a better corporate questline than Cyberpunk had for its “lifepath” … oh wait cyberpunk had literally no corpo questline
Cyberpunk is way more beautiful than Starfield and has almost no loading screens, while Starfield has a loading screen every 2 minutes and runs like shit compared to Cyberpunk, wich ran better on launch
“But what happens after the game is released ?”
“That is when the real development cycle begins”
Don’t worry, the modding community will fix starfield
I still dont get how is possible that ppl forgot how fucking trash was cyberpunk on release and even now its a fucking shell compared to GTA 4.
Who the fuck is comparing Neon to Night City? One is a settlement, one is an entire fucking video games map
😂 starfield boys are bored
Besides loading new areas almost every build you can enter in cp2077 you can enter and the ones that have a loading screen are usually hidden behind elevators, which will have tvs in playing news commenting on stuff that happens in the world.
Starfield if scuffed space engineers
4.5 hours in and i quit starfield. It was so slow and i spent so mutch time in the menu going to back and forth to planets doing boring quest with no meaning. A game needs to be fun right away. Not a menu simulator. i know there is mutch more to the game to explore and do. But this game is not it for me, drop the price and get som updates and i maybe try again.maybe…
I’ve played both now and I’ve beem enjoying Starfield waaaay more. Maybe Cyberpunk looks better and is better on a technical level but the RPG in it sucks. It’s a pretty cool, story-heavy action game. The combat music in Cyberpunk is awful. Just my opinion, Im not a Bethesda simp. Surprised how much I’ve been enjoying it.
People in comments still defending Starfield 💀
2077 is still shit. there were so many promises and nothing came of it
Why are we comparing this game to a boring game that’s been out for 7 years (no man’s sky) and another troubled game that’s been out for 3 years (cyberpunk?) Makes no sense honestly.
Starfield game of the year <3
Starfield 2 is boom and it’s coming.
Man, between Baldurs gate 3 and Cyberpunk 2.0, Starfield just looks worse and worse every day.
The only thing Starfield has over CP2077 is ship building and space exploration. Outside of that, CP2077 has Starfield beat on every other aspect.
This isn’t a fair comparison. A more fair comparison would be to compare the launch state of both games.
dont forget the first months of cyberpunk :D, compare the 2 after 2 years
Asmon is really farming the fake starfield outrage. Even though Cohh said he’s LOVING starfield.
Neon in starfield is a single alley with a hand full of rooms, night city in cyberpunk is a city. It’s hard to compare the two but starfield makes star citizen look great
witcher 3 shirt might give a hint which game he prefers 😀
Ship building in Starfield would be great if you could actually fly around 😀
day 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 of asking Asmongold to play cyberpunk (no this is not day 1)
This guy and Asmon and a majority of Asmons fans are missing the point of what people are saying. NEON itself isn’t better than Night City. No one is making that argument. No one is. You’re wrong about the argument being made. Neon delivers a better cyberpunk experience than some aspects of 2077. For example, Neon has an entire faction and very good questline around being a corpo and working for a massive Japanese themed tech corporation with red and black as its main colour scheme (Bethesda’s Arasaka). The questline and roleplay that Starfields Neon offers someone looking for an evil corpo experience is MUCH better than the Corpo lifepath offered by 2077. The gangs in Neon also feel more interactive (though I would hesitate to say they feel more *alive*) than 2077’s because you can join them. You can turn down the main Starfield questline, go over to Neon, and spend 100+ hours on that planet having a genuinely good cyberpunk (the genre) experience.
The parts of the cyberpunk experience that Neon does better than 2077 are, more often than not, a result of 2077 simply not going for a storyline where V was an evil corpo. That was never the character V was going to be. But you don’t have restrictions like that in Neon in Starfield because you aren’t playing V, you’re playing whoever the fuck you wanna play.
I’ve been defending both 2077 and Starfield on launch because my rig, while middling at best for modern games, was evidently powerful enough to get near-bugless experiences out of both games on my playthroughs with them. So I feel like I have some ground to stand on when saying the argument is being misinterpreted. But Asmon has been willfully braindead regarding the Starfield release because it is, admittedly, more fun. But it *is* stale when the points being made aren’t humorous but just incorrect.
Hey, can someone get Asmongold to watch some of the new Cyberpunk 2.0 gameplay? It’s actually pretty insane to see what people can do with the new skills.
The only thing that kind of sucks is now that Cyberpunk has reached this point, we have to wait x amount of years for Cyberpunk 2 basically. This is the only DLC they said they were going to make. Good news is they are opening an entire studio in Boston to solely work on the next Cyberpunk and nothing else.
Cyberpunk way better game
Cyberpunk came out 3.5 years ago and was absolute shit. This is not their 1.0 launch. Im glad the game is fixed but Starfield had a 10000000000000000000% better launch. Its not close. Starfield in 3.5 years will be the most insane shit ever
People acting like they had never played a Bethesda game before Starfield, like, what were you all expecting?
“hes about to shit on starfield”
yea and starfield is about to deserve it lmao
Lol Asmon hasn’t played other ship/outpost building games, has he? Starfield pretty low on my list in that aspect. Only rarely do I agree with or clap for Cohh…but this is one of them.
Freelancer is better than starfield.
starfield just feels so empty and with about 300000 load screens
Does Asmon even plays games anymore?
Cyberpunk 2077 is golden now. On XSX. Playing on Ray Tracing quality mode is so much better now. Absolutely no need for performance mode now on XSX.
This is the beauty of games these days. Let them release their sh@t and buy if they are cool. If not, you have saved your cash
Lets never forget bethesda stole the ship building mechanics from kh1 a 20yro game.
after main story in cyberpunk there is not much else to do
Its a no brainer cyberpunks city would be more bigger because the whole game revolves around the city. The only complain i have about it is that you cant interact with anything other then just shooting people. Cyberpunk is missing activities like pool, darts, an arcade machine. Just something. Cause the city looks nice but it feels empty
Asmongold, try play the game Uboat, try to manual calculate the way from your torpedo!
Do it on stream!
all those streamers was so much amazed by garbage games, i dindt buy any of that wokeholic games, it seems, that iam the winner….
its like everyone arround play with a disfunktional footbal AND ENJOY IT
So they are comparing one city with no people in it to planets and cities of starfield this is stupid to even entertain
Mind you no one makes the fallout style games better than Bethesda
Both games are bland and boring in my opinion, both bad RPGs
“If it’s not fun, why bother?”
agreed
I’m not a Starfield hater…
*BUT*
Ship building is so surface level lol😂
I don’t even think it (starfield) is an average game. I mostly hear copium, that the game will be fixed by modders in the future, which just is admitting the game is lacking in its released state.
It’s mildly entertaining, but I’ve already noticed a dozen cut corners, myself, and I’ve barely touched the game. Put it back in the oven please.
They improved Cyberpunk a lot but it’s still let down by parts of the core game that they simply can’t improve upon. Starfield has room to grow into a better game but it’s unlikely they’ll put the work into it that CD:PR did. Overall Starfield had a better launch and has the potential to be the better game but current Cyberpunk is a bit better. They were both huge letdowns.
Like how is it rellevant? Cyberpunk when it was released it was literally playable on PC on 40 fps 😀 (if u got good pc) And i rather don’t mention bugs…Can we meet please in 2025 and then compare cyberpunk vs starfield? 😀 I mean cyberpunk got like 100 patches in these almost 3 years…I know starfield isn’t perfect and quick travel system is pretty annoying. I think that quick travel is there only because limitation on xbox…Because if it was like in no man sky (u jump to system and just land on planets and then travel with pulse engine between planets in system) yea it would been great, but u would literally need to render a fucking lot of information, which consoles wouldn’t handle…PC would probably handle it with some good ssd. Anyway this is just test game for new version of creator engine 2. So they wouldn’t go blind when they release TES VI
im really surprised that Asmon likes the shipbuilding, because its probably one of the worst I’ve seen personally.
Starfield does everything “okay”, but doesnt do anything necessarily bad.
Starfield is a game made by and for ppl huffing copium to swallow down that $80 they wasted to beta test it for normal ppl who will buy it in 3 years time when its fixed by the fans
Cyberpunk 2077 worth checking out now? That’s crazy.
Isn’t Coh biased because he’s in cyberpunk??
Neon, a from the looks of it, is an oil rig turned into a small city. Get the fuck out of here. Night City is and always will be 100% waaaaaaaaaay better.
“I like Starfield… BUT!”
The problem of Cyberpunk isn’t how the game looks, it’s the story that sucks balls. Starfield at least doesn’t even try to hook you up on its story while Cyberpunk does and fails miserably.
Launch Cyberpunk on my base PS4 is better than Starfield
I love Cyberpunk and am currently really enjoying Starfield, but Starfield’s release has made me appreciate Cyberpunk on a whole other level. Cyberpunk is sexy, and I don’t just mean physically, I mean the entire world and universe is just so enticing.
Cyberpunk was so shit when it came out that playstation needed to delist it
I’ve seen the discussion he’s talking about. And when I pushed back on it, they didn’t answer. Night City is one of the best cities in games ever.
Most buggiest CD projekt red game vs the least buggiest Bethesda game
That Passion of the Christ looking poster might be a promotion for a a mission you go on later, involving a convict on death row, who is born again. And Starfield doesn’t hold a candle to what’s in Cyberpunk 2077. Not even in ti’s super buggy launch condition.The scope is just insane. There’s no load screens going into buildings. Of course when you’re in a elevator that’s a load screen, but it’s made into the game and I can move around in the elevator and watch updates of the nightly news. In conversation it’s not just a character in a static position. You can move around while the character talking to you is moving around the kitchen cooking. Like a normal irl interaction. It feels more alive. Starfield will make you appreciate CP 2077.
Sorry, but Starfield is easily an 8.5 if you like Bethesda games.
2.0 is out now and it’s like a different game. They changed up the quests a little too.
If you’re going into it new, play on very hard, since it actually is hard now (heals are on a timer now etc).
If you’re an old player, I recommend starting fresh since it’s a different experience.
Cowbcat YouTube video on Cyberpunk at launch should remind people not to compare it to Starfield.
The new Cyberpunk 2.0 update is pretty dang good – feels good to zip around with a sword, blocking bullets n’ all that.
Dont think its fair, Starfield just released , Cyberpunk had 3 years to fix the absolute awful state it was at release. And its not much of an unbiased opinion, Coh is literally IN cyberpunk 2077
starfield mods > starfield the game.
starfield ship look cool…….lol good one!
Cyberpunk just got it’s 50gb update lol may reinstall it later but still binging Star field I over played cyberpunk so I’m good
Bethesda makes Creativity Tools.
Yea, i agree, oooh, just a little bit, honestly, i find it very boring after finishing armored core 6 three times, i rather play the arena then play starfield, taking the ship combat mini game away, what are they doing different then before ? Nothing, the faces are still stiff, the animations are still stiff, the weird cloth looking armor and helmets that stretch around your character are still there, the bugs and glitches are still there, i cannot progress the story because during dialoque the menu will dissapear, it is very underwelming to say the least, i loved Morrowind and Oblivion by the way, Fallout new vegas was also cool, but it’s constantly the same, running around an open field with some buildings doibg fetch missions, they really need to completely revamp the company in my opinion, it really has to go cd project red rpg kind of direction, with a fully fleshed out open world with vehicles, traffic, pedastrians etc.
Starfield is a fair 8.5 and I love all games and consoles it’s a bit buggy ect.. but got that bethesda charm and side quests that I like plus all the other things I haven’t even come across yet
This is true nex gen
people keep comparing 3 to 6 year games that were launched like a piece of shit and got the love they needed throughout the years like cyberpunk and no mans sky, but starfield came out like 2 weeks ago. how would it play in 5 years??
come on compare onions with onions or whatever u guys say over there
Cyberpunk rules. Recently started Star Field after finishing new game ++ on AC6 and damn I got bored real fast. Not knocking it , just struggling for it to pull me in, so slow paced.
Bro i was like how tf i always miss Asmon stream on twitch but i just found out he is streaming on his alt fml lmao
BALD JESUZ>TOD
To be fair, Cyberpunk 2077 happens in one single city, Starfield does not. So the comparison is a stupid one, since they are completely different. That was Cohh’s point, but for some dumb reason people are trying to paint it as if he’s shitting on Starfield, when he’s actualy shitting on starfield fanboys that are saying stupid shit.
It’s funny how we’re comparing a 3 year old game to one that’s about 3 weeks old. It’s as if everyone magically forgot what a $#!t show CP77 was when it released. At least Starfield was playable.
Coh literally shilled all over Starfield in the release and gave it 10/10 lmfao
It wasn’t my type of game at release but I’ll give this game a third chance. It’s a gorgeous game but the world felt like a moving wallpaper most of the time in my opinion. There isn’t really any activities to do on the map except shoot people and most buildings are just for show and can’t be entered.
I hope 2.0 improves this aspect a bit otherwise the game is no different from release in my eyes.
It’s ironic how cyberpunk is used as a exemple of a good game now that starfield is out. Don’t get me wrong, i liked cyberpunk, it was unfinished at the launch? It was, but anyway only saying how ironic it is
Both games are trash, GTA 5 came out 10 years ago and it functions better than cyberpunk. It`s shameful that new game releases are worst than games from 10 years ago.
Cohh has an NPC in Cyberbugg so he will always support Projeckt Red … also Starfield is average
Cyberpunk is an awesome tech demo, until you play it and see that their open world often doesn’t even match the level of interactability that we had in 2001 with GTA3.
Cohh, CDPR professional fluffer.
There are some MASSIVE Bethesda fanboys that treat Todd’s games as the greatest thing since sliced bread.
It’s been interesting seeing his opinion on starfield evolve. First it was 5-6 then it was 4-6 close to 4 and now it’s a solid 6.
Neon isn’t even as good as Mass Effect 2’s Omega, and that was 13 years ago
cyber2077 now after the PL is probably top 10 in terms of world building / Lore. then again og bladerunner is my top 3 movies so some bias there.
Starfield was GOTY for a game that came out 10 years ago. It would be impressive if it was made by 6 dudes in an indie studio. Bethesda needs to drop Gamebryo, and modders will just have to cope. It’s literally killing their studio at this point.
he’s gonna milk the shit out of Cyberpunk, isn’t he?
not complaining tho
got a good ship builder but you got to fast travel everywhere anyway so ur ship has no purpose
Is that Cyberpunk on Xbox Series S? Damn..
Looks way better than Starfield. 😅
For how long it took them to make Starfield, I’m incredibly disappointed with the seemingly little innovation. It just feels like another space game that could have come out 10 years ago =(
The only down side to this 2.0 update is my mods are broken. I mainly hate how they didn’t really update the character model, it still looks ugly compared to the 4k models. The Ai is better, police overhaul is amazing, driving has gotten better but motorcycles need work still. It’s just sad that this game should have released like this, I also am not a big fan of them advocating to start a new story to play 2.0 and get “immersed”. Shit I already beat it as male and female V 5 times. As for starfield, I own it and have 5 hrs game time, that’s it. I’m giving it a few more months before I actually play it more. I need Bethesda to come out with more updates and I know the modders community is going drastically improve it more than what it is right now.
The only thing that Starfield does well is uninstall.
Cyberpunk just got a fresh coat of paint to cover up the whole lots of new bugs, breaking already good game balancing, and still half the game you were promised(remember they guaranteed three expansions?). The game currently runs nearly as bad as it was at launch, and it will be swept under the rug with its Edgerunners clout.The double standards isn’t astonishing.
people were shitting all over CP2077 on release with same shit like ( bad water, crowd reacts poorly to guns etc) while I just enjoyed PC version back then, I mean, 3 years from now, Starfield might be a blast with another 2-3 faction story dlcs and more ship classes/ more variety for planet terrains, more variety for random outposts
Not to mention the very first time you SEE night city it beats all of neon
Above average? Is 5 the average? I guess if you account for every game ever listed.
Kinda a weird thing to be into, but Cyberpunk Devs literally made THOUSANDS of custom ads for the world of Cyberpunk based on stuff from Cyberpunk 2020 that have different formats depending on where and on what they’re displayed on. It’s actually nuts how much love and care went into the scultping of the world for Cyberpunk, shame it had gotten so much (kinda deserved) hate at launch for all the missing stuff.
easily one of my favorite games to just walk around and explore in, the city feels so lived in (especially from my early 2.0 play last night) and the story, even all the side stuff, is all SO GOOD
CohhCarnage looks like that anti-tech street preacher from Cyberpunk haha
The world of Cyberpunk 2077 is much more thought out and aesthetically pleasing than all of Starfield locations combined in my opinion.
Played Cyberpunk on release date in 2020 and when on to play it for… two hours? Have been playing Starfield for the past three straight weeks and am completely in love with the game. To compare it to Cyberpunk is an absolute disgrace, even with the 2.0 update
starfield might be above average for asmon but thats only because his sample size for games is in the single digits
Played cyberpunk day one on xbox one s and it was awesome, I completely ignored what the main stream corporations said about it.
Funny how people forgot how Cyberpunk was at launch, it took 3 years for CDPR to fix that game I’m happy it’s were it should be right now but i can’t compare it to Starfield at least i was able to put in over 80 hours into Starfield with minimal bugs Cyberpunk was unplayable for me at the time.
Funniest part is, even a 2.0, Night City is still damn lifeless comparing to Starfield. The ”I heard you can enter a room in this game without getting a loading screen” still doens’t happen… since you can’t actually enter rooms in this game lol
Starfield has great ship building the problem is there isn’t much stuff to do with said ship.
5/10 is average? What
I want to personally thank Bethesda for making the greatest advertisement for every other game ever made
It’s why when I hear people scream GOTY I have no idea what they’re talking about. It’s a New Game simulator with okay ship building and out post building that’s only alright if you’re okay not doing one more New Game Plus to destroy your work. Otherwise, this game isn’t even the “Skyrim in space” game people tried to claim it as. I mean, other than having a weak main story and some worthwhile side quests that’s about the only thing it has in common with Skyrim…and I don’t even like either of them to begin with.
Here’s hoping Elder Scrolls VI and Fallout V are worth finishing.
Should rename starfield, spaceship building simulator. Then people won’t have such high expectations about open world exploration
Cyberpunk is like 2 years out with lots of updates. Can’t compare them too much in their current state. Compare them when Starfield has been out for 2 years also. Cyberpunk 2.0 is really good though. I’ve been playing it in 4k with Ray Tracing and it looks amazing!
People say Cyberpunk was terrible from technical perspective on release. I also had a ton of bugs but never a critical one. Whole with Starfield I have already encountered a critical but that made me load save that was made half an hour before that.
And yes, low graphics in Starfield are purely disgusting
Neon is the Duplo block version of Night City.
Starfield is good overall with poor optimization. Cyberpunk was like that at launch + so many bugs that you couldn’t even count them
Neon was literally just one street with a couple vendors and a club with some neon signs above them. Thats it. Anybody saying that is better than ANY part of Night City is coping hard.
Starfield is trash 3/10. 5/10 at best.
Cyberpunk is playable only once… after that there is no reason to do a second playthrought. Unless dlc. I won’t forget their lies.
So starfield is a 6/10 to asmon… dont get me wrong starfield isnt good but keep in mind he rated D4 a 9/10
CohhCarnage is literally in Cyberpunk 2077 as a quest giver npc.
Remember 2077 release? Atleast starfield isn’t buggy AF like that lmao. Keanu Reeves literally T-Posing while sprinting
That’s not fair – Cyberpunk had few years or polish and additiional content.
SAme with No Man Sky – comparing polished, old game to new, fresh release is not cool
carry on with critic – they deserve all of it
and gamers who blindly support weak products which tells developers to not put more efforts
The problem with Starfield is that there is no character to it, no sense of exploration, and for a Bethesda RPG not a lot of depth. There is no travelling anywhere in space except a short dogfight sequence, the “maps” There are no maps at all because the planets are just rocks, trees, and outposts and it misses that unique charm fallout maps had or Skyrim of identifiable locations you remember. The main story is the worst they’ve ever made and seems so lazy of just repeating the same thing over and over again. The good elements are the ship building and the gunplay is alright but even then not a lot of choice in builds or anything.
Cyberpunk 2077, 2.0 update is a massive game changer.
Anyone saying Starfield is better than Cyberpunk is delusional. Sure, it might get better with mods in the future, but between the base game there’s no contest.
Starfield is a ship-building game. People who like shipbuilding should play Starfield. People who don’t like ship-building shouldn’t expect anything else from the game. That’s just fair. If you look at Starfield trough the shit-building lens it’s actually a pretty good ship-building game. The hate just comes from people with wrong expections who also don’t like ship-building.
Last gen support stripped these features that were apart of 1.5, 1.6, and 2.0. Should have never been available. I started on PS4 and had to put it down. Came back 2 years later on a 5 and it’s night and day.
What is a “above average” game tho?
You mean above the median of quality of all games, or above the average game that you are willing to play?
It is a pointless statement if you compare the median quality of all games because most player only play the top 5% of the games.
There should be a Gaurdians of the Galaxy vs Starfield. Guardians does almost everything better.
Starfield < Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 is finally out of Early Access! (still missing stuff that CDPR overpromised though)
Outpost building in Starfield is VERY bad.
And it’s one of the thing that the game is actually getting very bad.
The main issues of Starfield imo:
– stealth mechanics (notice that hacking a computer and lockpicking a lock are the same minigame)
– outpost building and usefulness (every mechanics around it)
– big issue with level scaling and the fact that pretty quickly in the game you can one shot everything while being almost non killable
The only defense for starfield is shipbuilding when the space combat is lackluster and the ship building itself outside of trying to break shipbuilding is pointless with all the fast travel and loading screens
Starfield is a more massive game than CB2077. CB2077 has the depth but not the width. You can look between the nooks and see that so much is missing and empty. Starfield is MEANT to feel empty. Its space but its filled with so much more do to and accomplish than CB2077. CB2077 is a 40hr game. Starfield is a 1000+ hour game. Comparable but people need to stop looking at starfield and acting like CB2077 is a better game. Its like looking at an airplane and wondering why a car drives better on the highway than an airplane does. They are just vastly different vehicles of video games. Cb2077 is the car, Starfield is the massive airplane that can go more places and do more than a car can do.
Everyone obviously Cohh gonna like Cyberpunk more then Starfield. Because he is in the Cyberpunk not Starfield.I hope devs stop adding streamers to their games just for popularity. Everyone should mind their own business.
guess what guys; two different games
Cyberpunk doesn’t have the ability to drop one million potatoes and they stay there in game so you guys with your lousy comparisons look stupid
to be fair kingdom hearts had a better ship builder starfeild and that was only for a mini game between worlds
Garry the Prophet is always correct.
The game should be renamed to “LoadingScreen Field”. Hands down the most disappointing release of 2023
Starfield with some mods looks … let’s say “decent”…but come on, Cyberpunk looks a whole lot better…
Cyberpunk looks generations ahead of Starfield. I’ve honestly seen PS3 games that had better graphics and physics than Starfield.
My biggest gripe with Cyberpunk was that CDPR were actively scamming by selling it on last gen consoles. A bad game is a bad game but paying your money and getting something that doesn’t even function is worse.
To be fair, that Cyberpunk footage was running DLSS3.5 which is the major source why it looks so amazing compared to release
This is exactly how I feel.
I can’t take the crappy Creation Engine character models anymore. They are barely improved from eleven years ago. Garbage.
Are we going to overlook the state OG 2077 came out in? So many promises that weren’t delivered…
Cyberpunk 2077 was so broken at release. Physiks were missing / gameplay / graphics.
Like No Mans Sky, both games were not good at first. I like No Man Sky a lot by now and right now I’m having fun in Starfield and hoping for the best. It makes me want to finally try Cyberpunk or play No Man Sky or Star Citizien again.
I’m happy I got to try out Cyberpunk 2077 beta when it first released but it is nice to finally get my hands on the definitive edition now that it has been fully released.
2020 Cyberpunk was better than Starfield.
After playing the most recent updated with all the DLSS and Pathtracing cranked up to the max.
You can’t convince me that there is a better looking world than CP2077’s.
It looks amazing, the people look realistic and damn near everything reacts or is interactable in some way.
Gameplay was a 7 at launch but easy 8-9 now.
Played Cyberpunk last night for the first time in a long time after hearing about DLSS 3.5, Ray reconstruction, etc. He isn’t kidding it looks and plays so much better than the last time I played it. Considering getting Phantom Liberty now after reading the reviews and playing this new 2.0 overhaul.
Bruh, you can’t even rate Starfield 6/10 in any way. It’s not even mid, it doesn’t even come close to No Man’s Sky or Cyberpunk now.
Well knowing Bethesda, Starfield is never gonna make the same come back that Cyberpunk 2077 did
Hey atleast they are not the cyberpunk city from Destiny 2
Cyberpunk was utter shit when it came out.
Anyone saying Starfield’s Neon is better than Night City is lying or hasn’t finished Cyberpunk 2077. There’s no contest. I daresay Night City is objectively better than all the Starfield cities and procedural terrain COMBINED.
Hes more generous than me. I rate starfield a 5/10.
Show me cyber punk on release vs starfield on release
have to preface any and all criticism related to Starfield with your credentials and how much you like Starfield or else your criticism gets dismissed as being a sony fanboy.
No one said that lol
Starfield is a good 2015 game
Love how low these big companies standards are
Imagine if people just started playing games , and enjoy them, i nstead of watching them on youtube and complaining how bad they are. Starfield and same cyberpunk, not perfext alot of bugs, but when you play for long enough you just kinda like it
If Bethesda and Microsoft had confidence in selling Starfield, it wouldn’t be on Game Pass day one.
2077 is so much better though. I know it had problems on launch for a lot of people… but I had such a blast playing that game.
Both games are as boring as stacking plates. One just has nicer plates.
They made Neon too “safe”
I believe starfield gets so much hate because the fanbase were constantly screaming that this was gonna be not only game of the year but game of a generation. They really thought that starfield was gonna be better than baldurs gate 3, zelda, elden ring, god of war and be a genre defining game. Truth is that people are already starting to forget about starfield and talk about other games like cyberpunk and lies of pi and this is still the same month this “game of a generation” was released.
Don’t forget, the more you want Asmon to play a game, the less likely he is to play it.
Yeah I was watching his play through on starfield and it was so annoying there was always one guy in chat comparing Neon to the entirety of Night City and saying it was better like what are they smoking?
Outer Worlds is just a better starfield
I love both games. Imagine that.
StarMID
First
Today’s Fact: The Titanic’s sister ship was named the Britannic, and both vessels met tragic fates: the Titanic sank on her maiden voyage, while the Britannic sank during World War I.