Starfield vs No Man’s Sky – Details and Physics Comparison
The best comparison between the two games Starfield (2023) and No Man’s Sky (2016), I will compare the most important similarities, physics, details, textures and special places in the game. The entire video was created by myself (GameLight).
The idea of creating Starfield appeared in the 90s, from Todd Howard, and officially the game began to be developed in 2015, and we saw the game on September 1 for the premium edition and September 6 for the standard edition. In Starfield, the game is an RPG set in space where we have to find answers to the riddles of artifacts, build a base, build spaceships, fight bounty hunters, etc.
Timestamps:
0:00 Water physics
0:50 Biomes
1:50 Swimming
2:25 Flight (Landing and taking off)
3:27 Grav jump
4:11 Meteorite details
4:47 Mining
5:21 Alien animals
6:18 Falling from height
6:43 Fire damage
7:13 Transport
7:43 Thank you for watching
#starfield #nomanssky #bethesda
Views:24323
Taqs:starfield vs no man’s sky,starfield vs no mans sky,starfield vs no man’s sky graphics,starfield vs no man’s sky physics,starfield vs no man’s sky details,starfield physics,starfield details,no man’s sky physics,no man’s sky details,starfield comparison,no man’s sky comparison,starfield,no man’s sky,no mans sky,bethesda,starfield gameplay,no man’s sky gameplay
コメント
コメント (65)
トラックバックは利用できません。
Starfield has its advantages, like free movement in a spaceship, good action, and story. No Man Sky is more of a survival game, the goal of which is primarily to farm resources and explore different planets. Animals in No Man Sky are generated, but not in Starfield, also No Man Sky on the one hand feels like an arcade game which many players don’t like. Both games are good, the main thing is which aspects of the game are more important to you.
No man sky much more fun
starfield transport – just standing there
no man’s sky transport – drives around in a monster stuck
Starfield – loading. . . . . 💀😂
You forgot the part where there’s nothing to do in No Man’s Sky, and it looks like a toddlers game.
Imo Starfield needs more color on planets and I wish I could build a massvie fleet of ships to go with me when I travel. Still early on the game’s life so maybe some awesome dlcs coming
Bizarrement, Starfield fait rager les pros sony qui ne jurent que par NMS maintenant. 😂😂
No man sky psvr2 with the new Update is outstanding, and the only game i PLAY right now. Starfield was a disapointment🤮
сравнение г-но… зачем сравнивать водичку, вы сравните полеты над планетой… что в Starfield нет космоса? надо же какая неприятная неожиданность! как можно сравнивать безшовный мир немужицкого неба с коридорными пострелушками беседки?
If you believe starfield, a next generation games, is the pinnacle of the space gaming industry.
Please, go play that mediocre excrement and flush it away far far away.
не не не. Сравнивайте с релизной версией no mans sky, а не обновленной 2019-23годов.
на старте она была ужасна. страшная и кривая.
Water physics: Starfield
Biome: Both
Swimming: Starfield
Flight: No mans Sky
Grav Jump: Both
Meteorite: No Mans sky
Mining: No mans sky
Alien Animals: Starfield
Falling: Starfield
Fire Damage: Starfield
Transport: No mans sky
Overall: No mans sky
Any game is better than starfield.
In NMS you can have a life and enjoy the game without actively following the story/missions.
Sir you forgot to compare Physics like the ones within a Star System and gravity on planets. For example. When your ship is still in Starfield the simulated orbit around you completes its cycle. When your ship is still in No Mans Sky everything else is still too because No Mans Sky doesn’t have a simulated orbit.
Como en todo, cada quien tiene sus gustos. Pero para mi que exprimi al máximo ambos juegos e incluso juegos como elite dangerous, x4 y starcitycen con mas de 200 horas c/u y no hablando sin haber probado los juegos y tirando odio, puedo decir que Starfield es el juego mas completo de todos. Toma elementos de aqui y de alla para abarcar muchas mecanicas en un solo juego, a esto sumale el roleo que bethesda le pone a sus juegos, un juego de 8.5 para mi. No existe un juego perfecto, y Starfield no es la excepción pero no lo hace un mal juego.
Starfield NO es un juego enfocado a la exploración espacial, es un juego de ROL , montarte tu propia historia con tus personajes con toques de exploración.
Y al menos cumplío lo que se mostró en tráiler y gameplay que es en lo que nos deberíamos de basar y no en las ideas que uno se inventa del típo “imagínate si el juego tiene x mecánica”, no mintió como x compañia con su juego en su salida.
Biomes
No Man Sky : varied with beautiful sky
Starfield : begging modders to make it look less boring
My fun with NMS is to play that game in VR. The feeling in a ship to see it front to back and all around inside and outside without moving the ship is very nice, something you can’t see when you play non-VR
On sait aujourd’hui que les deux jeux sont incomparables hélas… C’est triste qu’il ait fallut attendre la sortie de Starfield pour s’en rendre compte…
Règle n°1 : Ne pas faire confiance à Bethesda.
I played both, prefer starfield
Starfield: 20 years and $200 million… 🤣🤣🤣
Starfield is trash.
Comparing two completely different games is completely incorrect. NMS is a completely empty game. There is nothing to do in it but to mine resources and build an outpost.
Besides, the author is being sly. He hasn’t shown what kind of ships you can build in Starfield. He didn’t show what beautiful planets there are in Starfield. He only showed the worst of what Starfield has. It’s so fashionable to berate Starfield nowadays)
God dude what a boring and surface level comparison. I hate these comparison videos being rushed out just to get views.
Cnt believes the nms fanboys cpoing😂😂
The fact a 2016 indie game is so easily compared to a $400 million dollar budgeted AAA Bethesda game proves how creatively bankrupt Starfield really is.
Es como comparar la velocidad con el tocino
В Старфилд визуал хороший, но вроде как делать нечего, зато в No man’s sky интрига в игре, хочется исследовать игру.
Starfield is the rich preppy blond that’s very pretty but lacks depth. No man’s sky is the nerd, full of depth and interesting things to do.
Even the buggy and unfinished no man sky from 2016 is better than starfield
Combat?
NMS wins. Starfield is dogshit.
Now compare the launch games. No updates 😂
с меня лайк)
Starfield is not the goty of the year, but comparing with nms and his so many update to get there is well…
Not a good Idea, remember the beginning of nms?
Starfield have a much better start.
The futur will tell us if Bethesda care about his game and make some updates to improve they game.
Starfield jest gównem nie gra
Some things in this comparison are stupid, like the fire damage, for instance, you just did wrong in NMS buddy, those damaged machinery can only heat you up in cold enviroments, they wont burn you, if you are going for fire damage you should go on the top of a volcano, there the player can take fire damage, also you can take fire damage from fire storms, OR the flamethrower that the Sentinel mech has.
Also, caves in NMS arent POIs like they are in Starfield, they are sort of contained biome too, so much so that sometimes you need to explore to find subterranean creatures that only spawn in caves.
What i saw here was mostly a safe comparison between this two games, because if we went full out on it Bethesda would only have the rpg and story elements to back it up.
Both are bad. Horrible, pitiful texture. Even games like Modern Warfare on PlayStation 3 have better graphics and texture. Not to mention that the dynamics of the game are also better. Want another comparison? Max Payne 3, Mass Effect Triloby, Mafia, GTA V, or Spec Ops – The Line. These are just some of the most popular titles that surpass these two games.
Woah Woah hold on ! There’s a beaches in Starfield?
Eeeh.. COLOBOT that was game
If you are looking for exploration and freedom and don’t care about going far in the sci-fi = NMS
If you are looking for a story-driven game, quests and interaction in a so-called “NASA PUNK” style = Starfield
One day, a brand new IP will bring the best from both games and deliver the masterpiece that we expect.
No es justo comparar un juego que lleva desde 2016 sacando actualizaciones a un juego que se estrenó en Septiembre 6. Recientemente.
Starfield has way more biomes than you show.
They’re two different games. Should probably compare Stanfield to other space rpg and nms to other sandbox space games, like Space engineers or something.
The physics in nms are the way they are for a reason. Once you play the main game, preferably in normal mode, you’ll figure that out.
I think people forget that No Man’s Sky have like 7 years fixing and adding things.
In his launch day and the next two years was an horrible game, so much worse than Starfield.
Starfield don’t even have a month.
Give him time and will be a great game
People are so upset with starfield that they don’t realize is a Bethesda game. I love this game! It’s an alien version of skyrim, even physics are like in skyrim and that makes me laugh and love it even more. Yeah it can be a little laggy but so was skyrim with all its bugs and so on. On the plus side, Bethesda Devs knows how the mod community will improve their game
These are completely different games in terms of gameplay. It’s like comparing Saints Row and Fortnite just because both are cartoonish third person shooter with cars, buildings, planes and water physics. I know that hating Starfield is hyped these days and people starve for views/clicks, but people who really play the game and understood the idea don’t waste time making useless comparisons.
I don’t like the visual style of NMS. Too cartoonish for me. Starfield NASA Punk is just perfect.
No man’s sky (2016) vs. Starfield (2023)
There should be more fun in Starfield but it isn’t. There are many things missing in Starfield.
One is independent the other one is supposed to be a AAA but well I hope starfield will get better over years
but starfield has a great story with rpg dialog and fun shooting 🔫
You can definitely get fire damage… go to a hot planet… or volcanoes…and you can die from falling in NMS from the height you showed if you change difficulty. In my eyes Starfield was over hyped like NMS but NMS fixed shit. The only thing Starfield won is Water physics and swimming. BUT, in Starfield you can’t go underwater? Also, Starfield beats NMS on gun fights. So, NMS wins overall. I was so excited for Starfield… But it is a Besthda title and we all know what their reputation is. XD best thing they got for good gameplay and quality in my opinion is Las Vegas. Moving on….
Damn, I almost buy Starfield
No Man’s Sky > Starfield.
Easy win for No man’s sky
I’ve never seen so many Starfield copium breathers in the comments. Like damn. It’s just a comparison. Not which is better.
In terms of gameplay. No man’s sky is WAAY more fun. In terms of graphics Starfield is bettter. But in a videogame I think we can all agree that gameplay is more important…
Starfield planets are much more realistic looking
This all looks like no man’s sky post 2020 not 2016, show us some antigravity physics comparison?
starfield , la version Wish de NMS
Les deux ont des points négatifs et positifs
Ambos son bonitos
starfield con vehiculos como no mans sky y pudiendo ir a los planetas en el espacio seria genial, no importaria que toque aterrizar con pantalla de carga
👍